The composition of Infosys' U.S. workforce is too lopsided -- overwhelmingly South Asian -- to be an accident, allege the plaintiffs in a discrimination lawsuit.
The plaintiffs, four IT workers from around the U.S., brought their discrimination lawsuit against the India-based IT services giant in 2013. This week, they filed a motion seeking class-action certification from 2009, and say the potential pool of plaintiffs may be as large as 125,000.
...
Neumark wrote that "the share of South Asian workers in Infosys' United States-based workforce, when compared to the relevant labor market, is 301.17 standard deviations higher, and the statistical likelihood that this disparity is due to chance -- as opposed to a systematic difference in hiring favoring one group over the other -- is less than 0.0000001%, or less than 1 in 1 billion."
(Score: 2) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Friday November 04 2016, @03:32PM
Not sure if you were going for sarcasm of not.
I doubt race significantly effects any of those points.
For point 1 to be true, the average white applicant would have to:
Point 2 has mostly been discredited. There is no strong evidence that any race is inherently smarter than another. IQ tests test education as much as they test intelligence.
Point 3 is just silly (invoking Poe's law).