Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Friday November 04 2016, @02:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the finding-eco-danger dept.

Scientists from the Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICP RAS) and the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT) have demonstrated that sensors based on binary metal oxide nanocomposites are sensitive enough to identify terrorist threats and detect environmental pollutants. The results of their study have been published in Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical.

Due to rapid industrial growth and the degradation of the environment, there is a growing need for the development of highly effective and selective sensors for pollutant detection. In addition, gas sensors could also be used to monitor potential terrorist threats.

"Choosing the right sensor composition can make a device at least 10 times more effective and enable an exceptionally fast response, which is crucial for preventing terrorist attacks," says Prof. Leonid Trakhtenberg of the Department of Molecular and Chemical Physics at MIPT, who is the leader of the research team and the head of the Laboratory of Functional Nanocomposites at ICP RAS.

According to the research findings, the most promising detection systems are binary metal oxide sensors, in which one component provides a high density of conductive electrons and another is a strong catalyst.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 04 2016, @04:33PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 04 2016, @04:33PM (#422522)

    This is the most vague summary I've read in a while. What?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 04 2016, @04:48PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 04 2016, @04:48PM (#422529)

    I would have to agree with you there. Lots of thin air in TFA... but it did include the word 'nano'.

    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Friday November 04 2016, @06:33PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Friday November 04 2016, @06:33PM (#422560)

      And the words "terrorist" and "threat", because Publicity and Funding.

      Last time I checked, most terrorists carried the same kind of weapons as 2nd-amendment fans, or just knives. Those with bombs have not been shown to typically loiter around for long enough to trip relevant alarms.

      On top of which many cities and sensitive areas are so full of airborne "dangerous stuff" (cars exhaust, but also solvents, vaping smoke, fertilizers and cleaning products), I will have to be shown that a non-lab experiment can reliably weed out false positives...

      • (Score: 2) by frojack on Friday November 04 2016, @08:00PM

        by frojack (1554) on Friday November 04 2016, @08:00PM (#422587) Journal

        gas sensors could also be used to monitor potential terrorist threats.

        Seems to me the last terrorist gas attack was in Japan, and people started falling down before any sensors had time to go off.
        You would literally have to have these things everywhere to provide useful warning.
        And the useful false alarms would be an immense annoyance.

        Older sensors frequently alarmed anytime Janitors [nytimes.com] came near them. Apparently Mr. Clean is scary scary shit.

        --
        No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
  • (Score: 2) by inertnet on Friday November 04 2016, @05:01PM

    by inertnet (4071) on Friday November 04 2016, @05:01PM (#422531) Journal

    It says 'metal oxide', so I guess the terrorists drive rusty cars.

  • (Score: 2) by davester666 on Saturday November 05 2016, @06:25AM

    by davester666 (155) on Saturday November 05 2016, @06:25AM (#422757)

    Basically, these sensors will detect any cell phone, and turn it on remotely if it is turned off. Because the NSA heard a terrorist once touched a cell phone, so now they decided to track every single one in the hopes of narrowing down which people are possibly a terrorists.

    Now they have two lists:
    -likely terrorists with a cell phone (containing everyone with a cell phone)
    -likely terrorists with a cell phone that has a dead battery (special case, as they can't directly track these people remotely, but the people are technologically aware, so they have to dispatch a team of agents to physically follow these people)
    -likely terrorists without a cell phone (containing everyone without a cell phone)