Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Sunday November 06 2016, @01:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the they-forgot-Waterworld dept.

The weekend is upon us and if you are looking for something to help pass the time, look no further! The Ars Technica science fiction bucket list—42 movies every geek must see ...and nine bonus stinkers from which you should run away screaming.

[...] Lists of science fiction movies are a common item for discussion on the Ars staff Slack channel—particularly short lists of the best science fiction movies ever made. But "best" is an impossible word to quantify in any broadly applicable way—one person's "best ever" might be another person's worst, especially in a genre of movies as rich and varied as science fiction.

["Science fiction" is a meta term that refers to a huge host of sub-genres, from "hard" science fiction to skiffy to all points between. For this list, we've chosen to constrain eligibility requirements to movies that deal speculatively with science and/or the future. This lets us include classics like Frankenstein (which is properly sci-fi) while excluding films that skew heavily toward fantasy. Then again, we've got Star Wars in the list and that's not a future movie, so author's discretion trumps all, I suppose!]

While the Ars staff has some bitter disagreements on which movies are better than others, it's undeniable that some science fiction movies are mandatory viewing for the modern geek. To that end, rather than try to pull together another tired "top ten sci-fi movies" listicle, we've instead polled the Ars staff to try to come up with a definitive "science fiction bucket list"—that is, a list of sci-fi movies that you should absolutely see at least once before you die. They aren't necessarily the "best" movies by any specific set of criteria, but every film on this list is outstanding in some particular way. Some were groundbreaking in their stories or subject matter, some were controversial, and some contained a character or plot twist that went on to become an archetype, referenced in and reused by countless other films. Some films on the list, like Fritz Lang's Metropolis, are pure cinematic poetry; others, like Pacific Rim, are pure popcorn fun. And, as a bonus, we even included a bonus list of a few absolutely terrible stinkers at the very bottom.

[Continues...]

Here is Ars Technica's list of forty-two must-see movies. See the linked Ars Technica story for writeups on each film or follow the IMDb (Internet Movie Database) link provided here.

  1. 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) (IMDb)
  2. 28 Days Later... (2003) (IMDb)
  3. Alien (1979) (IMDb)
  4. Blade Runner (1982) (IMDb)
  5. Brazil (1985) (IMDb)
  6. The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension (1984) (IMDb)
  7. Children of Men (2006) (IMDb)
  8. A Clockwork Orange (1972) (IMDb)
  9. Computer Chess (2013) (IMDb)
  10. C.S.A.: The Confederate States of America (2004) (IMDb)
  11. The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951) (IMDb)
  12. District 9 (2009) (IMDb)
  13. Dune (1984) (IMDb)
  14. Enemy Mine (1985) (IMDb)
  15. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004) (IMDb)
  16. Forbidden Planet (1956) (IMDb)
  17. Frankenstein (1931) (IMDb)
  18. Galaxy Quest (1999) (IMDb)
  19. Ghost in the Shell (1995) (IMDb)
  20. Ghosts with Shit Jobs (2012) (IMDb)
  21. Godzilla, King of the Monsters! (1954) (IMDb)
  22. Her (2013) (IMDb)
  23. Mad Max: Fury Road (2015) (IMDb)
  24. The Matrix (1999) (IMDb)
  25. The Martian (2015) (IMDb)
  26. Metropolis (1927) (IMDb)
  27. Moon (2009) (IMDb)
  28. Pacific Rim (2013) (IMDb)
  29. Planet of the Apes (1968) (IMDb)
  30. Primer (2004) (IMDb)
  31. RoboCop (1987) (IMDb)
  32. Stalker (1979) (IMDb)
  33. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982) (IMDb)
  34. Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope (1977) (IMDb)
  35. Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) (IMDb)
  36. They Live (1988) (IMDb)
  37. The Thing (1982) (IMDb)
  38. THX 1138 (1971) (IMDb)
  39. TRON (1982) (IMDb)
  40. Videodrome (1983) (IMDb)
  41. WALL*E (2008) (IMDb)
  42. WarGames (1983) (IMDb)

And it may be best to avoid these:

  1. Bad Taste (1987) (IMDb)
  2. Barbarella (1968) (IMDb)
  3. Battlefield Earth (2000) (IMDb)
  4. Brain Damage (1988) (IMDb)
  5. Re-Animator (1985) (IMDb)
  6. Robot Jox (1990) (IMDb)
  7. Solarbabies (1986) (IMDb)
  8. Star Trek Nemesis (2002) (IMDb)
  9. Zardoz (1974) (IMDb)

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Celestial on Sunday November 06 2016, @05:21PM

    by Celestial (4891) on Sunday November 06 2016, @05:21PM (#423176) Journal

    is my favorite science-fiction film by a long shot. Sure, the plot is dumb... but as someone that grew up in the '80s and watched Robotech, Voltron, and Transformers as a child, it's just too awesome to see giant robots smash stuff on the big screen in a film that Michael Bay isn't involved in.

    Anyway, they should have definitely added Wing Commander as a movie to avoid. That movie was even worse than Star Trek: Nemesis.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by arslan on Monday November 07 2016, @01:46AM

    by arslan (3462) on Monday November 07 2016, @01:46AM (#423346)

    Exactly. I can understand why non-geeks or even a nerd would hate it, but why would any self-respecting geek hate it? Entertainment doesn't have to be thought provoking. It is robots vs monster with rock-n-roll! How is that not a geek wet dream?

    • (Score: 2) by AthanasiusKircher on Monday November 07 2016, @10:08PM

      by AthanasiusKircher (5291) on Monday November 07 2016, @10:08PM (#423784) Journal

      I suppose it depends on how one defines "geek." If "geeks" according to your definition must like it, then I suppose no "geek" would hate it.

      But just as you say that "entertainment doesn't have to be thought provoking," I'd challenge the notion that all "geeks" must necessarily like a movie with huge plotholes and a second half basically consisting of continuous special effects explosions and "fighting."

      I'm not judging anyone who likes it -- if it's your "cup of tea," that's great. Seriously. There are lots of movies like it, so there's clearly an audience for that, and I respect that.

      But I personally found the second half of that movie to be one of the most boring films I've seen in a long time, after a somewhat promising start (still full of plotholes, but I'm willing to forgive that if it goes somewhere). And there are action films I like. Anyhow, I'm not going to try to get into an argument about it, since it's probably not useful. Those who love it, love it. Those who don't, don't. Just because you're a "geek" (which to me means somebody interested in science and tech, probably likes his/her share of sci-fi and fantasy) doesn't mean you have to love any movie with giant robots.

  • (Score: 2) by tibman on Monday November 07 2016, @03:46PM

    by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Monday November 07 2016, @03:46PM (#423540)

    They put Robot Jox into the "bad movie" category but you may like it if you like giant fighting robots. Saw it as a kid and thought it was awesome.

    --
    SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.