SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the probably-not-coming-back-either dept.
The World Socialist Web Site reports
The US employment report for October released by the Labor Department on Friday, four days before Election Day, provided a snapshot of an economy that continues to be mired in stagnation. The net nonfarm payroll increase was a tepid 161,000, with the bulk of the new jobs, as in previous months, made up of low-wage service and part-time positions.
Economists had predicted a payroll increase of 173,000. Even with a combined upward revision of 44,000 jobs for the months of August and September, the overall rate of job-creation has slowed markedly, averaging 181,000 a month through October as compared to 229,000 for all of 2015.
The number of long-term unemployed remained at 2 million, comprising 25.2 percent of those officially counted in the government tally. These are extraordinarily high numbers for the seventh year of a so-called "recovery".
The decline in the official unemployment rate to 4.9 percent in October from 5.0 percent in September was not the result of workers joining the labor force and finding jobs, but the departure of 425,000 more working-age Americans, bringing the number of such workers who are outside the labor force to a near-record high of 94.6 million.
The labor force participation rate actually declined, reaching 62.8 percent in October versus 62.9 percent the prior month.
Via a paywalled story on May 29, 2012 in U.S. News & World Report, Economics professor Antony Davies, PhD said (Google cache) that it takes 180,000 new jobs a month just to keep up with population growth. So, anything less is actually a loss of US jobs.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 07 2016, @07:28AM
I think you will find the money supply is growing quite quickly, due to Fed givaways. But that hasn't translated into extra demand (and higher prices aka inflation) because the 1% and the cashed up corps aren't spending it.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 07 2016, @02:23PM
There's more than one money supply, and it's not in fact all fungible. There's cash and easily liquidated assets, then there's more solid stuff that can't be liquidated, then there are all sorts of agreements that represent money but can't really be turned into money. Then there is money overseas that can't be repatriated easily due to taxes or other barriers, or that is being held as foreign reserves. The cash supply affects prices most dramatically, and it's relatively isolated from much of the money creation since the 2007-9 crash. A lot of "money" created is probably never going to enter circulation among common consumers.