Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday November 07 2016, @05:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the This-fungus-is-not-very-fun,-Gus. dept.

A lethal and drug-resistant fungal infection is beginning to creep into the United States. Healthcare facilities are at risk:

Thirteen individuals have become ill from a serious and sometimes fatal fungal infection previously unseen in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Friday. The fungus, Candida auris, is known to occur in health care settings such as hospitals and nursing homes. Seven cases occurred between May 2013 and August 2016 in four states: Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey and New York. As of August 31, four of these seven patients, all with bloodstream infections, died, though it is unclear whether their deaths were due to C. auris. The remaining six cases were identified after August and are still under investigation. "It appears that C. auris arrived in the United States only in the past few years," Dr. Tom Chiller, chief of the CDC's Mycotic Diseases Branch, said in statement. He added that scientists are working to better understand the fungus so they can develop recommendations to protect those at risk.

C. auris bloodstream infections have a 50% fatality rate in some countries, according to one study. Some strains of this yeast are multidrug-resistant and cannot be treated by the three major classes of antifungal medications. First reported in 2009 in Japan, cases have been recorded in South Korea, India, South Africa, Kuwait, Colombia, Venezuela, Pakistan and the United Kingdom. "Experience outside the United States suggests that C. auris has high potential to cause outbreaks in healthcare facilities," the CDC notes on its website. Importantly, this deadly organism is difficult to identify using traditional laboratory biochemical methods.

CDC's Candida auris page; CDC's report on these first seven cases.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by DutchUncle on Monday November 07 2016, @08:54PM

    by DutchUncle (5370) on Monday November 07 2016, @08:54PM (#423744)

    The hype is what wakes people up to take action to AVOID the actual event. So far we haven't encountered a scare that we can't do something about. The risk, on the other hand, could be devastating. For example, the US election has pushed Zika off the front page so most people don't pay attention to over 30,000 cases in the US. That could lead to a lot of brain-damaged babies, which will be very expensive (not to mention a human tragedy).

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Monday November 07 2016, @10:59PM

    by aristarchus (2645) on Monday November 07 2016, @10:59PM (#423819) Journal

    Point taken. Not meaning to discount the human tragedy of any disease, or the costs. But "devastation"? Why not just "very, very bad, and we should do something"?