Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday November 07 2016, @05:34PM   Printer-friendly
from the bring-back-the-trolly,-too dept.

The New York Times has a story about what may be a more likely future of public transportation.

A small electric bus chugged along at a slow but steady seven miles per hour when a white van, entering the street from the side, cut in front of it. The bus slowed, as if its driver had hit the brakes, and got back up to speed after the van moved out of the way.

But this bus has no brake or accelerator pedal. It has no steering wheel, either. In fact, it doesn't have a driver — it operates using sensors and software, although for now, a person is stationed on board ready to hit a red "stop" button in an emergency.

At a time when self-driving cars are beginning to make progress — most notably with a trial program that the ride service Uber began in Pittsburgh this fall — the bus represents a different approach to technologically advanced transportation.

I say a more likely future because of the following:

A driverless car, after all, is still a car, carrying at best a few people. By transporting many passengers on what could be very flexible routes, driverless buses could help reduce the number of cars clogging city streets.

Few advantages accrue from driverless cars if the streets and highways are clogged with them. The passenger(s) can curse the vehicle up ahead instead of its idiot driver. My take: The idea has some promise, especially in places where people do not have long distances to travel.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Sarasani on Tuesday November 08 2016, @03:40AM

    by Sarasani (3283) on Tuesday November 08 2016, @03:40AM (#423914)

    That argument ("Can I put it in your yard?") could be used for a lot of things:

    • Like flying? Well, how about we put a runway through your yard.
    • Like driving fast? How about we put a highway through your yard.
    • Like children being educated? How about we put a kindergarten with a noisy playground in your yard.
    • Like your country defended? How about we put an aerial bombing practice range in your yard.

    And so the list goes on.

    I get your point, but we do need to look at the bigger picture when we're talking about proper city planning. Personally I don't think a lot of cities have been planned all that well. Some of the bad design decisions may be attributed to the "car is king" concept that societies have entertained for far too long [theguardian.com].

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2