Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Microsoft Office 2013 is Now Working via CrossOver 16

posted by martyb on Monday November 07 2016, @02:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the catching-up-on-APIs dept.

-- OriginalOwner_ writes:

CodeWeavers reports

Gone are [...] the days that we hopelessly tried to register Microsoft Office 2013. You read that right, people. [On November 2], we successfully registered Microsoft Office 2013 in a CrossOver 16 alpha build. We [can] also:

  • Open, create, edit, save, and print Microsoft office documents
  • Activate a copy of Microsoft Office 2013 [with a] product key or a 365 subscription
  • Use Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Project

"Everyone at CodeWeavers is incredibly excited to see Microsoft Office 2013 installing, registering, and running in CrossOver. After four years of continued development, we are preparing to deliver support for the 2013 versions of Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Project in CrossOver 16 (due out later this year). And we hope that our development will continue making strides to include support for Outlook 2013 and Microsoft Office 2016 in the coming months." -- James Ramey, President

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Microsoft Office 2013 is Now Working via CrossOver 16 | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 37 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 07 2016, @04:24PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 07 2016, @04:24PM (#423575)

    do your own google search.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 07 2016, @06:50PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 07 2016, @06:50PM (#423681)

    do your own google search.

    With respect, No.

    The point of this place is to aggregate news. I shouldn't have to search for jack shit. Vetted stories should clearly explain the 5W&H of a story, or the submitter should take the time to write a couple sentences explaining the missing ones. I shouldn't even have to RTFA if the submitter's done a proper job.

    This.... was worse than a Slashvertisement.

    Thanks to everyone who answered the question seriously, and it is appreciated. Two additional sentences in the summary would've done it for me.

    • (Score: 2) by isostatic on Monday November 07 2016, @09:24PM

      by isostatic (365) on Monday November 07 2016, @09:24PM (#423758) Journal

      Crossover is hardly the latest faddy javascript language, it's been arround for well over a decade. I'd hope that people on a site like this would recognise terms like "Codeweavers" and "Crossover".