Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by CoolHand on Monday November 07 2016, @08:54PM   Printer-friendly
from the politics-for-geeks dept.

Ars published a story about the effects the winner of Tuesday's presidential election could have on intellectional property issues:

The hot-button issues this election can be counted on one's fingers—and for most voters, things like copyright and patent policy don't make the list. Assigned to a wonkish zone far from the Sunday morning talk shows, intellectual property issues aren't near the heart of our deeply polarized political discourse.

Of the two major party candidates in 2016, only the Democratic candidate has a platform that even addresses copyright and patent policies. So today, let's look at what we know about Hillary Clinton's plan, and make some informed speculation about what could happen to these areas under a Donald Trump presidency.\

Given that the campaign is focused (as always) on a relatively small group of issues, tech policy watchers who spoke to Ars were surprised to see a presidential platform that mentions IP issues at all. Clinton's briefing paper on technology and innovation addresses both copyright and patent issues directly, and that in itself is something of a surprise. Trump's website has no such information, so the best clues to his approach lie in his public statements and the people he has surrounded himself with.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Tuesday November 08 2016, @01:49AM

    by Gaaark (41) on Tuesday November 08 2016, @01:49AM (#423891) Journal

    and allowing corporations (with more money than some countries) sue countries for loss of revenue if that country decides to, say, SAVE THE FREAKING BEES FROM BEING POISONED.

    Lets see:
    1. Save the bees that help pollinate our food supply
    2. Make one corporation a few more dollars.

    I will screw that corporation up the Uranus several times before i will let them sue Canada for 'loss of revenue because we can no longer kill bees'.

    Sheeit.

    and i just have that gut feeling that Hillary will flip-flop and vote FOR the TPP etc, because it will help the people who paid her milllllllllllions and she owes BIG TIME.

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2