Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Monday November 07 2016, @10:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the big-bro-on-the-road dept.

More than 1,000 motorists a week are being caught speeding on the UK's smart motorways, police figures suggest.

Last year, 52,516 fixed penalties were issued on 11 smart sections, including on stretches of the M1, M25 and M6.

This compared to 2,023 on the same stretches in 2010-11, before they were upgraded to smart motorways - which use the hard shoulder and variable speed limits to control traffic flow.

The government says they are used to improve capacity, not generate revenue.

Smart motorways are operated by Highways England, which uses overhead gantries - also containing speed cameras - to direct traffic into open lanes and change speed limits depending on the volume of traffic.

Ticket revenue has increased tenfold over 5 years. Have British drivers experienced the "improved capacity" that the government uses to justify the smart highways?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by AthanasiusKircher on Tuesday November 08 2016, @03:13PM

    by AthanasiusKircher (5291) on Tuesday November 08 2016, @03:13PM (#424092) Journal

    I *can't* creep along at 2 mph.

    Maybe not 2 mph, but that's rarely necessary. Even relatively heavy stop-and-go traffic often moves at average speeds more like 5-10 mph, which (depending on the transmission) you can often just coast in 1st to maintain constant speed (or maybe 2nd, if the average speed is a little higher). Truckers somehow have managed to do this with manual transmissions for decades.

    The more common problem is that this traffic frequently will accelerate to 15-20 mph (or even higher) for a few seconds, then slow to a crawl for a while, then stop, and then repeat. If you just keep at the steady 5-10mph the whole time, there's less wear and tear on your clutch, your brakes, your transmission, and less fuel use. Most people, though, simply can't help themselves and feel an irrational NEED to catch up with that car in front... which then leads to being stuck in the "crawl" before stop or whatever. Instead, if you go slow and constant, by the time you catch up, you don't need to crawl at all, but can keep going at the 5-10 mph you've been at all along.

    I know this isn't always possible (and some cars are more likely to stall out than others at low speeds), but I find it's much more typical than a stretch of road creeping along at 2 mph for an extended period.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Tuesday November 08 2016, @03:45PM

    by tangomargarine (667) on Tuesday November 08 2016, @03:45PM (#424100)

    Maybe not 2 mph, but that's rarely necessary. Even relatively heavy stop-and-go traffic often

    You obviously haven't driven my commute before :P

    As for the rest of your comment, yeah I try to minimize the amount of shifting I have to do, which naturally results in the driving pattern you're advocating.

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"