Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday November 11 2016, @02:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the its-a-job-I-suppose dept.

When a drop of liquid hits a surface at a sufficiently high speed, it splashes—that much isn't in doubt. But sometimes splashing isn't helpful. Researchers are working on methods of 'splash avoidance' that could prevent splashback of harmful or unhygienic fluids in a range of settings, from hospitals to kitchens - and perhaps even urinals.

In a new paper led by scientists at the University of Oxford and published in the journal Physical Review Letters, researchers show that coating a surface in a thin layer of a soft material like a gel or rubber could provide a simple solution to this problem.

Lead researcher Professor Alfonso Castrejón-Pita, Royal Society University Research Fellow in Oxford's Department of Engineering Science, said: 'We realised that no one had actually studied systematically what happens when droplets hit soft substrates. In our study, we dropped ethanol droplets on to soft materials made of silicone—the material often used in bathroom sealants. Silicone is very useful, as it can be made to have different levels of stiffness, ranging from a material comparable to jelly to something with a consistency more like that of a pencil rubber.

'We filmed the impacts with a high-speed camera at speeds of up to 100,000 frames per second—around 4,000 times faster than a typical mobile phone—and then studied the splashing dynamics. Combining these experiments with some theoretical modelling and detailed computer simulations, we found that tiny deformations of the substrate occur within the first 30 microseconds after impact, which, surprisingly, can be just enough to completely suppress splashing.

You're supposed to aim for the fly.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 11 2016, @08:28PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 11 2016, @08:28PM (#425810)

    In the case of restrooms/toilets I think the spread of disease comes from other bad design e.g.
    1) people having to touch taps to turn them on/off (worst are those crappy taps where you have to keep them pressed down to get any water flow (in theory you press them down and only a while later the water flow gets cut off but more often than not, it cuts off almost immediately).
    2) people having to touch door knobs/handles/doors to get out of the restroom.
    3) people having to touch restroom stall doors, their clothes (e.g. putting trousers back on), etc after pooping but before they can wash their hands. While I'm sure many people can clean their butts really well without getting poop on anything else other than the toilet paper, it doesn't work that well for everyone.
    4) Toilet paper isn't really that great at cleaning poop from butts.

    All these could be solved by:
    1) Taps that don't need to be touched. Sure you can use a paper towel but while that works for _you_ it's not working for everyone.
    2) Having no door but a bent corridor.
    3) Having an easy way for people to wash their hands, or an easy way to clean poop from butts without hands and toilet paper getting involved.
    4) In some countries water and soap is used.

    By the way, many people with infectious diseases use toilets more often than healthier people.