Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday November 12 2016, @11:05AM   Printer-friendly
from the not-a-merry-christmas dept.

General Motors plans to lay off 2,000 employees at two U.S. auto plants in early 2017, the automaker said on Wednesday.

GM's Lordstown, Ohio and Lansing, Michigan plants build slow-selling cars sold by Chevrolet and Cadillac. GM said it will furlough the employees when it cuts the third shift at both plants in January.

GM says the furlough is a response to what the company believes will be a continued shift from cars to crossovers and trucks. The Lordstown plant builds the compact Chevrolet Cruze, whose U.S. sales through October were down 20%. The Lansing Grand River plant builds the Cadillac ATS and CTS, whose sales were down 17% through October.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by quintessence on Sunday November 13 2016, @09:27AM

    by quintessence (6227) on Sunday November 13 2016, @09:27AM (#426218)

    Well, we can start with the TN visas which are not reciprocal as far as I know

    http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/04/06/tn_visa_lawyer_difference_betw/ [visalawyerblog.com]

    and maquiladoras, which essentially give companies with large capital the benefits of US society without bearing much of the costs that other non-favored business have.

    It also helped move multi-nationals to more prominence. I'd rather US companies stayed mostly in the US and dealt with the full consequences, or move to Mexico entirely and they can pay to deal with the problems in Mexico.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 13 2016, @07:37PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 13 2016, @07:37PM (#426313)

    > Well, we can start with the TN visas which are not reciprocal as far as I know

    Close enough reciprocity. [canadavisa.com] Still, TN visas are insignificant. Only about 8,000 TN visas per year [tnvisasample.com] H1B does 130,000 per year.

    > maquiladoras

    Dead. They were something 15 years ago, but China drained off those ultra-low-skill jobs even from Mexico. [sciencedirect.com] Sure there are a few hanging on by their fingernails, but effectively its a non-issue. Mexico got screwed by NAFTA on that one, the gold rush for those border towns lasted about a decade and now they are ghost towns.

    > It also helped move multi-nationals to more prominence.

    Well, that cuts both ways, those companies are multinationals because not only do they have international sales, they also have international supply chains. US manufacturing output is up 70% since NAFTA. [stlouisfed.org] We are the 2nd largest exporter, after China. That's what multinationals have done for the US.

    • (Score: 2) by quintessence on Sunday November 13 2016, @09:01PM

      by quintessence (6227) on Sunday November 13 2016, @09:01PM (#426341)

      Still, TN visas are insignificant.

      Except per the DHS, Canadians are the majority of illegals in US now.

      http://www.latintimes.com/canadian-immigrants-lead-world-illegal-us-visa-overstays-according-first-ever-dhs-367906 [latintimes.com]

      And it's not like Trump hasn't spoken to H1B visas. And while Canada has improved significantly over the last decade, it wasn't quite that easy to immigrate into Canada even shortly after NAFTA was signed.

      Sure there are a few hanging on by their fingernails, but effectively its a non-issue.

      You looking at a 10 year span from when NAFTA was signed, ignoring the effects it had on US manufacturing in the interim, and only looking at a very different world now.

      Per wiki:

      Between 1995 and 2000, exports of assembled products in Mexico tripled, and the rate of the industry’s growth amounted to about one new factory per day.

      Since globalization and physical restructuring[citation needed] have contributed to the competition and advent of low-cost offshore assembly in places such as China, and countries in Central America, maquiladoras in Mexico have been on the decline since 2000: According to federal sources, approximately 529 maquiladoras shut down and investment in assembly plants decreased by 8.2 percent in 2002 after the imposition of countervailing duties on Chinese products, not available in North America, that were part of the electronics supply chain.[9] Despite the decline, over 3,000 maquiladoras still exist along the 2,000 mile-long United States–Mexico border, providing employment for approximately one million workers, and importing more than $51 billion in supplies into Mexico.

      And especially with consideration of TPP, you are looking at a rehash probably with Viet Nam.

      US manufacturing output is up 70% since NAFTA.

      Per your graph, US manufacturing was on the uptick prior to NAFTA, and doesn't tease out which parts were directly attributable to NAFTA.

      That's what multinationals have done for the US.

      Except the largest employers in the US are still small businesses.

      The vast majority of trade agreements essentially function as gimmes to multi-nationals while leaving other businesses in the lurch. If we are talking about free trade, then let's do free trade instead of deals that are written with the interests of multi-nationals in mind.