Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday November 13 2016, @11:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the purveying-porn-for-profit-and-prosecution dept.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/11/fbi-operated-23-tor-hidden-child-porn-sites-deployed-malware-from-them/

As Ars has reported, federal investigators temporarily seized a Tor-hidden site known as Playpen in 2015 and operated it for 13 days before shutting it down. The agency then used a "network investigative technique" (NIT) as a way to ensnare site users.

However, according to newly unsealed documents recently obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union, the FBI not only temporarily took over one Tor-hidden child pornography website in order to investigate it, the organization was in fact authorized to run a total of 23 other such websites.

Security researcher Sarah Jamie Lewis told Ars that "it's a pretty reasonable assumption" that at one point the FBI was running roughly half of the known child porn sites hosted on Tor-hidden servers. Lewis runs OnionScan, an ongoing bot-driven analysis of the Tor-hidden darknet. Her research began in April 2016, and it shows that as of August 2016, there were 29 unique child porn related sites on Tor-hidden servers.

"Doing the math, it's not zero sites, it's probably not all the sites, but we know that they're getting authorization for some of them," she said. "I think it's a reasonable assumption—I don't think the FBI would be doing their job if they weren't."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 14 2016, @09:17AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 14 2016, @09:17AM (#426467)

    The entire premise of arresting and charging people with POSSESSION of child pornography (where there is no evidence of direct harm to children) is because allowing unfettered distribution and access to child porn aids in creating and sustaining the market for it.

    If only we could get them to take that discussion with the people pushing laws like the DMCA. Allowing free distribution of CP will create and sustain the market, we must limit it to destroy the market. Allowing free distribution of music will destroy the market, we must limit it to sustain the market.