SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
I've come across an article on The Atlantic that analyses Trump's personality:
Many questions have arisen about Trump during this campaign season—about his platform, his knowledge of issues, his inflammatory language, his level of comfort with political violence. This article touches on some of that. But its central aim is to create a psychological portrait of the man. Who is he, really? How does his mind work? How might he go about making decisions in office, were he to become president? And what does all that suggest about the sort of president he'd be?
It's a long, but very interesting read.
Here's a list of sentences the article itself highlights:
Combined with a gift for humor, anger lies at the heart of Trump's charisma.
Trump appeals to an ancient fear of contagion, which analogizes out-groups to parasites and poisons.
Narcissism in presidents is a double-edged sword. It is associated with historians' ratings of "greatness"—but also with impeachment resolutions.
Andrew Jackson displayed many of the same psychological qualities that we see in Trump.
Trump has never forgotten the lesson from his father: The world is a dangerous place. You have to be ready to fight.
And the final paragraph summarizes:
Who, really, is Donald Trump? What's behind the actor's mask? I can discern little more than narcissistic motivations and a complementary personal narrative about winning at any cost. It is as if Trump has invested so much of himself in developing and refining his socially dominant role that he has nothing left over to create a meaningful story for his life, or for the nation. It is always Donald Trump playing Donald Trump, fighting to win, but never knowing why.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 15 2016, @01:17AM
> god-complex
You are really having a hard time comprehending the difference between NPD and narcissism, aren't you?
I wonder, are you a dictionary pedant and think the word has one and only one meaning, a meaning that you happen to be particularly invested in?
Or are you just doubling-down because your ego is too brittle to admit a mistake no matter how glaringly obvious it is to everyone watching you?
I'm sure your response will be unintentionally revealing all on its own.
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday November 15 2016, @01:39AM
Run through the checklist on each of them from what is publicly known. Each and every one fit at least eight of the nine that were listed. Except Reagan. Guy was like Mr. Rogers levels of humble to the American people if not to the rest of the world. Yeah, he was an actor but he wasn't that good of an actor.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 15 2016, @04:38AM
Game. Set. Match.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 15 2016, @05:03AM
Proof by non-example.
In Buzzaro-world that's the strongest possible argument.
You really can't argue with that logic.
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday November 15 2016, @11:46AM
Chuckles, I don't need to offer proof for what you can prove to yourself in seconds. Look at the list. Objectively rate each President. Now apologize for wasting everyone's time.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 15 2016, @07:50AM
The fact that they all look the same to you is a function of where you stand, not where they are.
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday November 15 2016, @11:43AM
Where I stand on this is Nonpartisanville, Reality. How about you?
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 15 2016, @02:01PM
> Where I stand on this is Nonpartisanville, Reality. How about you?
Lol. Do you hear yourself?
That's about as plausible as the MSM claiming they are non-partisan.
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday November 15 2016, @08:56PM
Oh I know you're butthurt that I rip on your team more than the other one. That's only because the ones creating the progressive movement at the moment are anti-liberty hatemongers though.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 2) by ikanreed on Tuesday November 15 2016, @03:30PM
No, you've got a pretty consistent pro-idiot slant, whether you assign that a party affiliation or not.
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday November 15 2016, @08:53PM
That's funny coming from a "liberal" whose president has expanded pretty much every anti-liberty program Bush created/allowed. Are you even still a liberal if you're against the liberty that is your root word?
My rights don't end where your fear begins.