Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday November 15 2016, @03:31AM   Printer-friendly
from the making-the-most-of-an-opportunity dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

ProtonMail suggests fear of the Donald prompting lockdown

"ProtonMail follows the Swiss policy of neutrality. We do not take any position for or against Trump," the Swiss company's CEO stated on Monday, before revealing that new user sign-ups immediately doubled following Trump's election victory.

ProtonMail has published figures showing that as soon as the election results rolled in, the public began to seek out privacy-focused services such as its own.

CEO Andy Yen said that, in communicating with these new users, the company found people apprehensive about the decisions that President Trump might take and what they would mean considering the surveillance activities of the National Security Agency.

"Given Trump's campaign rhetoric against journalists, political enemies, immigrants, and Muslims, there is concern that Trump could use the new tools at his disposal to target certain groups," Yen said. "As the NSA currently operates completely out of the public eye with very little legal oversight, all of this could be done in secret."

ProtonMail was launched back in May 2014 by scientists who had met at CERN and MIT. In response to the Snowden revelations regarding collusion between the NSA and other email providers such as Google, they created a government-resistant, end-to-end encrypted email service.

Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/11/14/protonmail_subs_double_after_trump_victory/


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by opinionated_science on Tuesday November 15 2016, @10:48AM

    by opinionated_science (4031) on Tuesday November 15 2016, @10:48AM (#426912)

    this election convince me (!) that both political parties are simply businesses. They don't care about anything other than power, and the money that comes with it.

    This is probably why most of the population feels disenfranchised - but I am no longer surprised by the corruption and lies.

    I'm not surprised by Trump either - the media orgy to coronate Hilary was simply obvious.

    But both parties suffer from dogma delusion, so we can expect more of the same...

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Tuesday November 15 2016, @12:27PM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Tuesday November 15 2016, @12:27PM (#426923) Journal

    the media orgy to coronate Hilary was simply obvious.

    I've developed a theory I've dubbed "Taste the Rainbow" to explain it. One of the strongest memes from the election was, "OMG we have to elect our first woman president! Wouldn't that be awesome and historic to do that right after electing the first black president?!" That suggested to me their gameplan was to pick the most evil person they could for the job, but make sure that they had some extrinsic quality from the rainbow of humanity. Thus, after electing a woman president it would become time to "Elect the first Asian president!" and then "The First Gay President!" and then "The First Trans President" and so on. Life for Americans would plummet across every index but the "Taste the Rainbow" would prove how much progress we were making.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    • (Score: 2) by VLM on Tuesday November 15 2016, @12:46PM

      by VLM (445) on Tuesday November 15 2016, @12:46PM (#426930)

      Or basically, a diversity hire scenario applied to POTUS.

      Its a good distractor issue if the candidate is a psychopath or sociopath. Nobody would take a mafia boss or Al Capone or "insert famous white male criminal here" seriously as a candidate, but if the candidate is the first XYZ, then just pound the table with propaganda about it being the first XYZ.

      • (Score: 2) by t-3 on Tuesday November 15 2016, @02:30PM

        by t-3 (4907) on Tuesday November 15 2016, @02:30PM (#426966)

        Can a convicted criminal serve as president? Will the next great civil rights movement be the repatriation of those who have already been punished?

        • (Score: 3, Funny) by VLM on Tuesday November 15 2016, @03:32PM

          by VLM (445) on Tuesday November 15 2016, @03:32PM (#426991)

          After that the next great progressive goal will be to use cloning technologies so we can have election candidates being "Stalin-II" vs "Literally Hitler"

    • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Tuesday November 15 2016, @03:33PM

      by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Tuesday November 15 2016, @03:33PM (#426994) Homepage Journal
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday November 15 2016, @12:30PM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Tuesday November 15 2016, @12:30PM (#426924) Homepage Journal

    this election convince me (!) that both political parties are simply businesses. They don't care about anything other than power, and the money that comes with it.

    Excellent! Now if we could just get more people to pick the red pill instead of the blue one...

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.