Legislators have drafted a bill [PDF in Russian] that will boost Free Software on multiple levels within the Russian Federation's public sector.
The draft, approved by the Russian Federation's Duma (lower chamber) in mid-October, requires the public sector to prioritise Free Software over proprietary alternatives, gives precedence to local IT businesses that offer Free Software for public tenders, and recognises the need to encourage collaboration with the global network of Free Software organisations and communities.
[...] Another interesting aspect of the law is how the authors of the bill have made an extra effort to ensure the language used in the draft are correct. For one, only software carrying licenses that allow the four freedoms may be legally labelled as "Free Software":
Source: Free Software Foundation Europe
(Score: 3, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Tuesday November 15 2016, @05:44PM
Essentially, SaaS misses the boat on freedom 0: The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose
If a SaaS solution were "fully free" it would be free to duplicate on your own hardware (freedom 2), and free to migrate the data from the SaaS provider to either your own hardware or another SaaS provider's system.
Freedom and business interests rarely align.
🌻🌻 [google.com]