Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Friday November 18 2016, @08:01AM   Printer-friendly
from the no-more-profits-from-false-prophets dept.

Google and Facebook finally announced steps to tackle fake news on their respective platforms this week following increasing pressure from critics eager to halt the flow of falsehoods online.

Both companies said they will prohibit fake news websites from advertising on their platforms, thus reducing the exposure of such articles to the public while also starving the companies of an important source of advertising income.

The move comes after the companies received a wave of criticism over its role in propagating misinformation, particularly in this election cycle in which many observed that a bitter partisan war was potentially worsened by polarizing news sources touting untrue assertions. While the technology companies have in the past been hesitant to mediate the flow of news, this change might signal a change in thought as they come to grip with the real-life implications of lackluster surveillance on their platforms.

Wrongthink will not be permitted, citizens.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Username on Friday November 18 2016, @11:40AM

    by Username (4557) on Friday November 18 2016, @11:40AM (#428796)

    The Onion leans left, they will never be targeted.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by BasilBrush on Friday November 18 2016, @04:11PM

    by BasilBrush (3994) on Friday November 18 2016, @04:11PM (#428899)

    As the Fake News problem leading up to the election was universally right-wing, that's probably true.

    --
    Hurrah! Quoting works now!
  • (Score: 2) by urza9814 on Friday November 18 2016, @07:12PM

    by urza9814 (3954) on Friday November 18 2016, @07:12PM (#429025) Journal

    They won't be targeted because they lean *establishment*. Particularly now that they're owned by one of Hillary's major supporters...

  • (Score: 2) by quintessence on Friday November 18 2016, @07:52PM

    by quintessence (6227) on Friday November 18 2016, @07:52PM (#429061)

    To me it's less a question of left or right, but more a philosophical stance that the best way to address this is through more speech.

    Any of these stories could be debunked. People could engender a more skeptical perspective, especially given it is a political season.

    That people are focusing on such a blunt approach for what amounts to a chain email with better graphics speaks more to the continued degradation of free speech, especially from people who supposedly at least pay lip service to the idea.

    It use to be the right moving to ban/restrict debil music and like due to undue influence, and now it's come full circle under the banner of people protecting "the truth".

    These campaigns never end well, and instead just mark the idiocy of the age.