Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by on Saturday November 19 2016, @01:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the simon-says-campaign-in-pennsylvania dept.

Submitted via IRC for chromas

The Clinton presidential campaign used a complex computer algorithm called Ada to assist in many of the most important decisions during the race.

According to aides, a raft of polling numbers, public and private, were fed into the algorithm, as well as ground-level voter data meticulously collected by the campaign. Once early voting began, those numbers were factored in, too.

What Ada did, based on all that data, aides said, was run 400,000 simulations a day of what the race against Trump might look like. A report that was spit out would give campaign manager Robby Mook and others a detailed picture of which battleground states were most likely to tip the race in one direction or another — and guide decisions about where to spend time and deploy resources.

Of course, the results are only as good as the data. Since the outcome of the election was different than most poll predictions, it seems like Ada may have had a Garbage In, Garbage Out problem.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by NCommander on Saturday November 19 2016, @09:20PM

    by NCommander (2) Subscriber Badge <michael@casadevall.pro> on Saturday November 19 2016, @09:20PM (#429624) Homepage Journal

    I think this is an unfortunate name collision, as I can't see anyone using Ada for this; it was likely written in R if I had to take a guess. As someone who actually uses and enjoys coding in Ada though, its great when you need to get it right the first time, and you're willing to build a program for mass distribution. An in-house tool is overkill.

    --
    Still always moving
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by darkfeline on Saturday November 19 2016, @09:51PM

    by darkfeline (1030) on Saturday November 19 2016, @09:51PM (#429635) Homepage

    I prefer Haskell as my tool of choice for "must not fail". I've not much experience with Ada, but the fact that it has null pointers weakens the "get it right the first time" argument. Any language with a NULL type has a flawed type system.

    --
    Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!