Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Saturday November 19 2016, @01:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the simon-says-campaign-in-pennsylvania dept.

Submitted via IRC for chromas

The Clinton presidential campaign used a complex computer algorithm called Ada to assist in many of the most important decisions during the race.

According to aides, a raft of polling numbers, public and private, were fed into the algorithm, as well as ground-level voter data meticulously collected by the campaign. Once early voting began, those numbers were factored in, too.

What Ada did, based on all that data, aides said, was run 400,000 simulations a day of what the race against Trump might look like. A report that was spit out would give campaign manager Robby Mook and others a detailed picture of which battleground states were most likely to tip the race in one direction or another — and guide decisions about where to spend time and deploy resources.

Of course, the results are only as good as the data. Since the outcome of the election was different than most poll predictions, it seems like Ada may have had a Garbage In, Garbage Out problem.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Francis on Saturday November 19 2016, @11:43PM

    by Francis (5544) on Saturday November 19 2016, @11:43PM (#429693)

    That wasn't me.

    Also, just because you've got no critical thinking skills doesn't mean that the AC is wrong here. We've got the emails and even without the emails, how do you explain the huge numbers of Democrats who had their registration changed to GOP in New York and the people who's registration was dropped in California?

    Even without the emails from the DNC, that looks incredibly suspicious.