Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Saturday November 19 2016, @11:52PM   Printer-friendly
from the so-when-does-real-news-become-fake-news dept.

Earlier this week Google announced that its advertising tools will soon be closed to websites that promote fake news, a policy that could cut off revenue streams for publications that peddle hoaxes on platforms like Facebook.

The Verge reports:

The decision comes at a critical time for the tech industry, whose key players have come under fire for not taking neccesary steps to prevent fake news from proliferating across the web during the 2016 US election. It's thought that, given the viral aspects of fake news, social networks and search engines were gamed by partisan bad actors intending to influence the outcome of the race.

What constitutes 'fake' news?
Who decides what is 'fake'?
Who is a 'partisan bad actor'?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 20 2016, @02:03AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 20 2016, @02:03AM (#429752)

    agreed, Alex Jones really does drag PJW down a lot, which is why I only follow him and not the whole of infowars.

    the thing though that I really hate is how there is so much contempt for bipartisanship by the MSM, but I suppose that's mostly due to the cultural marxists that control it, along with the advertisers who fuel it. everything has to be "extreme" to generate any emotion now. hell I wouldn't be surprised if in the near future we're holding some battle-royale type thing to decide the winner of an election. though I suppose even that wouldn't be as bad as it is now, at least there could be some credibility and campaign funding wouldn't gain you any advantages.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 20 2016, @03:12AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 20 2016, @03:12AM (#429771)

    > cultural marxists

    No wonder you guys are treated to so contemptuously
    You are only reaping what you sow
    Enjoy the taste of those tears while you can

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 20 2016, @09:20AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 20 2016, @09:20AM (#429851)

      there is no other word best suited to describe them.

    • (Score: 2) by SanityCheck on Sunday November 20 2016, @03:51PM

      by SanityCheck (5190) on Sunday November 20 2016, @03:51PM (#429925)

      I have to agree with him thou, "cultural marxist" is actually very very fitting from what I been able to gather. It is insane the lengths to which the narrative has gone, and everything we see now is the society convulsing after realizing it swallowed this poison. Shit even I started thinking some social equality is good, and then the slippery slope started and now I'm on the total opposite. They scared the shit out of me and turned me into a meritocrat now that I see where the "cultural marxists" will take their arguments once they have their foot in the door.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 20 2016, @04:29AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 20 2016, @04:29AM (#429800)

    PJW? WTF PJW est? SJW en alia nomen? Cui est "Alex Jones"?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 20 2016, @11:40AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 20 2016, @11:40AM (#429862)

      Bellatores Pajama.