Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday November 21 2016, @04:21AM   Printer-friendly
from the tested-on-mice-and-kids dept.

NPR reports on different interpretations of a recent study involving young mice and prolonged audiovisual stimulation:

The debate centered on a study of young mice exposed to six hours daily of a sound and light show reminiscent of a video game. The mice showed "dramatic changes everywhere in the brain," said Jan-Marino Ramirez, director of the Center for Integrative Brain Research at Seattle Children's Hospital.

"Many of those changes suggest that you have a brain that is wired up at a much more baseline excited level," Ramirez reported. "You need much more sensory stimulation to get [the brain's] attention."

So is that a problem?

On the plus side, it meant that these mice were able to stay calm in an environment that would have stressed out a typical mouse, Ramirez explained. But it also meant they acted like they had an attention deficit disorder, showed signs of learning problems, and were prone to risky behavior.

Overall, the results add to the evidence that parents should be very cautious about screen time for young children, Ramirez said. "I would minimize it."

A more optimistic interpretation came from Leah Krubitzer, an evolutionary neurobiologist at the University of California, Davis. "The benefits may outweigh the negative sides to this," Krubitzer said, adding that a less sensitive brain might thrive in a world where over-stimulation is a common problem.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 22 2016, @08:38AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 22 2016, @08:38AM (#431131)

    > Why is current humanity inherently superior to a humanity with "deadened brains", [...]
    > It is subjective.

    Indeed it is subjective! And yet when an addict is reduced to mental mush, although it's their choice to do so, most persons see that change as a loss.

    So, it's subjective, like preferring the taste of shit or of ice cream. But just because some few fetishists exist, doesn't mean a subjective preference for the taste of ice cream over shit is anything but good taste.