Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Monday November 21 2016, @10:45AM   Printer-friendly
from the post-labor-economics dept.

Pundits will debate the wellsprings of Donald Trump's election triumph for years. Right now, cultural explanations are in the lead. Multiple researchers and journalists are stressing the role of "racial resentments" and xenophobia as the deepest sources of Trump's appeal. And such explanations cannot be dismissed.

But the decades-long decline of U.S. manufacturing employment and the highly automated nature of the sector's recent revitalization should also be high on the list of explanations. The former is an unmistakable source of the working class rage that helped get Trump elected. The latter is the main reason Trump won't be able to "make America great again" by bringing back production jobs.

The Rust Belt epicenter of the Trump electoral map says a lot about its emotional origins, but so do the facts of employment and productivity in U.S. manufacturing industries. The collapse of labor-intensive commodity manufacturing in recent decades and the expansion in this decade of super-productive advanced manufacturing have left millions of working-class white people feeling abandoned, irrelevant, and angry.

To see this, one has only to look at the stark trend lines of the production data, which show a massive 30-year decline of employment beginning in 1980. That trend led to the liquidation of more than a third of U.S. manufacturing positions. Employment in the sector plunged from 18.9 million jobs to 12.2 million.

[...] In fact, the total inflation-adjusted output of the U.S. manufacturing sector is now higher than it has ever been. That's true even as the sector's employment is growing only slowly, and remains near the lowest it's been. These diverging lines—which reflect the sector's improved productivity—highlight a huge problem with Trump's promises to help workers by reshoring millions of manufacturing jobs. America is already producing a lot. And in any event, the return of more manufacturing won't bring back many jobs because the labor is increasingly being done by robots.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Monday November 21 2016, @04:40PM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Monday November 21 2016, @04:40PM (#430620) Homepage Journal

    You're most likely absolutely correct. The unions up there have effectively priced themselves out of the market. I expect the same will eventually happen with the industries in the south too, because unions have no history of being able to tell when they are about to go a step too far.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by MostCynical on Monday November 21 2016, @09:48PM

    by MostCynical (2589) on Monday November 21 2016, @09:48PM (#430858) Journal

    Worker safety (equipment, clothing, training, etc) time off for family issues, overtime pay, holiday pay, breaks, those unions just have to give up on having workers have quality of kife! It is BAD for the US!

    --
    "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
    • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday November 22 2016, @12:08AM

      by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Tuesday November 22 2016, @12:08AM (#430944) Homepage Journal

      If the economy will not support a business that pays what they're demanding, they do themselves no favors by demanding it. Short term gain, long term unemployment.

      --
      My rights don't end where your fear begins.
      • (Score: 2) by MostCynical on Tuesday November 22 2016, @12:33AM

        by MostCynical (2589) on Tuesday November 22 2016, @12:33AM (#430951) Journal

        Not having to work with a machine that can take your hand off?
        8-hour day?

        Time to see your family?

        Yep. Definitely short-term.
        Some unions may be money-grabbing, but generally, daddy or mommy are less likely to die at work because of them.
        Also, paying people somlittle they need food stamps or other charity to be able to eat is evil.

        If middle and senior managers only got paid up to 200% of the lowest paid worker, there would be enough to pay everyone a bit better.

        --
        "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
        • (Score: 3, Insightful) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday November 22 2016, @01:14AM

          by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Tuesday November 22 2016, @01:14AM (#430964) Homepage Journal

          Very much short term if it causes the business to move the shop overseas or go out of business entirely. Yes. The union's objective should be to provide the highest sustainable standards for its workers. Most unions forget the word "sustainable".

          --
          My rights don't end where your fear begins.