Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday November 22 2016, @12:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the way-of-the-dodo dept.

My ad-supported Kindle's buttons are dying, so I'm in the market for a new eBook reader. I figured the upcoming sales would be a good time to buy one. To my surprise, eBook readers seem to be regressing rather than advancing. My hard requirements are:

  1. e-Ink display
  2. Text-to-speech
  3. Don't need company's software to transfer books

And my preferred features include:

  1. Good PDF support (so a larger display with the same aspect ratio of a piece of paper). I want to read technical books on it, something I can't do with the Kindle.
  2. Stable software
  3. Doesn't spy on everything you do (Kindles track absolutely everything)
  4. Support for multiple voices. The same voice gets annoying after a few books.

I'm unable to find anything which fulfills all those conditions. Any recommendations? Before you say smartphone, it needs an e-Ink display. Are smartphones and tablets killing eBook readers?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 22 2016, @04:17PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 22 2016, @04:17PM (#431292)

    and their display is a 640x480 from 2003 that flickers and is dark because the backlight is near dead

    Has there ever been a 640x480 LCD screen? I though that resolution was long obsolete at the time LCD screens started replacing CRTs.

    I already had an 800x600 CRT screen in 1995. And that was definitely not high-end even back then.

  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Tuesday November 22 2016, @04:43PM

    by TheRaven (270) on Tuesday November 22 2016, @04:43PM (#431321) Journal

    Has there ever been a 640x480 LCD screen?

    Yes, I had one for a while. I got it a few years after it was new (around 2005 - local computer shop selling old stock off for next to nothing).

    I though that resolution was long obsolete at the time LCD screens started replacing CRTs.

    LCDs were a lot lower resolution than CRTs when they were introduced.

    --
    sudo mod me up
  • (Score: 2) by Pino P on Tuesday November 22 2016, @05:11PM

    by Pino P (4721) on Tuesday November 22 2016, @05:11PM (#431337) Journal

    Has there ever been a 640x480 LCD screen?

    The PowerBook 190cs [apple-history.com] (August 1995) was 640x480.

  • (Score: 2) by dyingtolive on Tuesday November 22 2016, @05:44PM

    by dyingtolive (952) on Tuesday November 22 2016, @05:44PM (#431358)

    My first desktop LCD was about 1280x1024.

    They were smaller back in the day though, but you only mostly found them on laptops, for example: Thinkpad 800 series had a 640x480. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThinkPad#Early_models. [wikipedia.org]

    My dad had a laptop that might have just been 320x200. I want to say it was an ancient 286 or 386, maybe the T5100? Can't recall, unfortunately.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for moose wang!
  • (Score: 1) by toddestan on Wednesday November 23 2016, @04:11AM

    by toddestan (4982) on Wednesday November 23 2016, @04:11AM (#431654)

    640x480 certainly existed in early laptops. Never seen a standalone screen of that resolution. I have seen one standalone 800x600 screen. The smallest common resolution seems to be 1024x768, though that's still relatively uncommon compared to the 1280x1024 which was very popular for a few years.