Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Thursday November 24 2016, @11:44PM   Printer-friendly
from the soros'-programmers-screwed-up dept.

CNN Wire reports via KTLA TV in Los Angeles

Hillary Clinton's campaign is being urged by a number of top computer scientists to call for a recount of vote totals in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

[...] The computer scientists believe they have found evidence that vote totals in the three states could have been manipulated or hacked and presented their findings to top Clinton aides [on November 17].

The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners.

[...] [It was noted that] Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic voting machines, which the group said could have been hacked.

Their group told Podesta and Elias that while they had not found any evidence of hacking, the pattern needs to be looked at by an independent review.

[...] A former Clinton aide declined to respond to questions about whether they will request an audit based on the findings.

Additionally, at least three electors have pledged to not vote for Trump and to seek a "reasonable Republican alternative for president through Electoral College" according to a [November 16 statement] from a group called the Hamilton Electors, which represents them.

"The Founding Fathers created the Electoral College as the last line of defense", one elector, Michael Baca, said in a statement, "and I think we must do all that we can to ensure that we have a reasonable Republican candidate who shares our American values."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Friday November 25 2016, @02:14AM

    by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Friday November 25 2016, @02:14AM (#432701) Homepage Journal

    It depends on the machine. Most leave a paper trail. If there's no way for a manual recount, those votes SHOULD be voided and the idiots who run the state should be voted out of office next election.

    --
    mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by mhajicek on Friday November 25 2016, @04:53AM

    by mhajicek (51) on Friday November 25 2016, @04:53AM (#432746)

    Paper trails can and have been falsified too.

    --
    The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek
  • (Score: 2) by Celestial on Friday November 25 2016, @06:56AM

    by Celestial (4891) on Friday November 25 2016, @06:56AM (#432772) Journal

    As I replied below, I live in and voted in Pennsylvania. We're one of the few states that votes entirely electronically, with no paper trail.

    • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Friday November 25 2016, @06:05PM

      by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Friday November 25 2016, @06:05PM (#432926) Homepage Journal

      Then your politicians are morons and your state's votes should be thrown out. We need a federal law mandating a paper trail; paper is a lot harder to hack than bits. In Illinois, you mark a paper ballot, which is inserted into the computer, where it's coun ted and stored.

      --
      mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org