Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Thursday November 24 2016, @11:44PM   Printer-friendly
from the soros'-programmers-screwed-up dept.

CNN Wire reports via KTLA TV in Los Angeles

Hillary Clinton's campaign is being urged by a number of top computer scientists to call for a recount of vote totals in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

[...] The computer scientists believe they have found evidence that vote totals in the three states could have been manipulated or hacked and presented their findings to top Clinton aides [on November 17].

The scientists, among them J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, told the Clinton campaign they believe there is a questionable trend of Clinton performing worse in counties that relied on electronic voting machines compared to paper ballots and optical scanners.

[...] [It was noted that] Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic voting machines, which the group said could have been hacked.

Their group told Podesta and Elias that while they had not found any evidence of hacking, the pattern needs to be looked at by an independent review.

[...] A former Clinton aide declined to respond to questions about whether they will request an audit based on the findings.

Additionally, at least three electors have pledged to not vote for Trump and to seek a "reasonable Republican alternative for president through Electoral College" according to a [November 16 statement] from a group called the Hamilton Electors, which represents them.

"The Founding Fathers created the Electoral College as the last line of defense", one elector, Michael Baca, said in a statement, "and I think we must do all that we can to ensure that we have a reasonable Republican candidate who shares our American values."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 25 2016, @03:06AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 25 2016, @03:06AM (#432720)

    Gee, remind me what party Sanders ran under again?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 25 2016, @03:34AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 25 2016, @03:34AM (#432731)

    You appear to be one of those[1] who has swallowed Bernie's "democratic socialist" bullshit.
    [1] Heh. I almost said "nitwits".

    First, that term is redundant.
    Socialism is DEMOCRACY EVERYWHERE.

    If you can find a transcript[2] of something where Bernie has said that he has a plan to seed a whole bunch of worker-owned cooperatives as has been done in Italy via their Marcora law, [google.com] that would interest me greatly (because I haven't seen anything like that).
    [2] I don't do video.

    Additionally, Bernie has said **specifically** that he isn't into gov't ownership of the means of production.
    So, isn't even one of those faux "socialists".

    What Bernie is is a kinda-sorta FDR New Dealer.
    That comes under the heading of "Liberal Democrat" or "Social Democrat".
    (He's just fine with Oligarchy.)

    .
    On top of that, Bernie is a Chickenhawk.
    He doesn't have any particular qualms about USA's permanent state of war.
    (He also fought like hell to get a squadron of F-35s stationed in his home state.)
    So, even on the Authoritarian/Civil Libertarian axis, Bernie isn't especially Progressive.

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]