The aloe vera gel many Americans buy to soothe damaged skin contains no evidence of aloe vera at all.
Samples of store-brand aloe gel purchased at national retailers Wal-Mart, Target and CVS showed no indication of the plant in various lab tests. The products all listed aloe barbadensis leaf juice — another name for aloe vera — as either the No. 1 ingredient or No. 2 after water.
[...] Aloe’s three chemical markers — acemannan, malic acid and glucose — were absent in the tests for Wal-Mart, Target and CVS products conducted by a lab hired by Bloomberg News. The three samples contained a cheaper element called maltodextrin, a sugar sometimes used to imitate aloe. The gel that’s sold at another retailer, Walgreens, contained one marker, malic acid, but not the other two.
A related article from FatPhil discusses herbal supplements which, upon analysis, did not contain the ingredients their labels claimed.
Caveat emptor.
(Score: 5, Funny) by theluggage on Sunday November 27 2016, @11:06PM
They should have labelled it Homeopathic Aloe Vera! 100x more potent than the version that actually contains the active ingredient!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 28 2016, @11:03AM
Well, their next version might be sold as "now with 100% more Aloe Vera" and it will not even be a lie, as 100% of nothing is still nothing.