Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Sunday November 27 2016, @10:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the you-get-what-you-pay-for dept.

Bloomberg reports:

The aloe vera gel many Americans buy to soothe damaged skin contains no evidence of aloe vera at all.

Samples of store-brand aloe gel purchased at national retailers Wal-Mart, Target and CVS showed no indication of the plant in various lab tests. The products all listed aloe barbadensis leaf juice — another name for aloe vera — as either the No. 1 ingredient or No. 2 after water.

[...] Aloe’s three chemical markers — acemannan, malic acid and glucose — were absent in the tests for Wal-Mart, Target and CVS products conducted by a lab hired by Bloomberg News. The three samples contained a cheaper element called maltodextrin, a sugar sometimes used to imitate aloe. The gel that’s sold at another retailer, Walgreens, contained one marker, malic acid, but not the other two.

A related article from FatPhil discusses herbal supplements which, upon analysis, did not contain the ingredients their labels claimed.

Caveat emptor.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Nollij on Tuesday November 29 2016, @03:16AM

    by Nollij (4559) on Tuesday November 29 2016, @03:16AM (#434326)

    There are a disturbingly high number of people that believe simply replacing HFCS with plain sugar makes anything infinitely healthier.
    You can see this marketed in the various "natural" and "organic" brands all across your local grocery.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2