Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday November 28 2016, @08:46PM   Printer-friendly
from the julia-computing-not-julia-child dept.

Researchers from Julia Computing, UC Berkeley, Intel, the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and JuliaLabs@MIT have developed a new parallel computing method to dramatically scale up the process of cataloging astronomical objects. This major improvement leverages 8,192 Intel Xeon processors in Berkeley Lab's new Cori supercomputer and Julia, the high-performance, open-source scientific computing language to deliver a 225x increase in the speed of astronomical image analysis.

The code used for this analysis is called Celeste. It was developed at Berkeley Lab and uses statistical inference to mathematically locate and characterize light sources in the sky. When it was first released in 2015, Celeste was limited to single-node execution on at most hundreds of megabytes of astronomical images. In the case of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), which is the dataset used for this research, this analysis is conducted by identifying points of light in nearly 5 million images of approximately 12 megabytes each – a dataset of 55 terabytes.

Using the new parallel implementation, the research team dramatically increased the speed of its analysis by an estimated 225x. This enabled the processing of more than 20 thousand images, or 250 gigabytes – an increase of more than 3 orders of magnitude compared with previous iterations.

The original paper is available.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 28 2016, @09:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 28 2016, @09:05PM (#434219)

    While I pray every day for MATLAB to die a quick horrible death, the Julia people discredit themeselves by continuing to promote disingenuous 10 squillion-fold speed up gains. If you code the wrong way then you can get disastrous performance in any language. No need for those for-loop shennanigans and "yeah, but if you didn't know..." explanations. Everyone knows.

    You already win on price and probably on performance too without any sleight of hand. Put real, indisputable comparisons out there that can't get knocked down by 30 seconds of research.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1