Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday November 29 2016, @03:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the getting-their-measure dept.

Fundamental constants are physical quantities that are universal in nature.
...
According to a recent evaluation and update of the values of the fundamental constants by researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the uncertainties in measurements of the constants have now been reduced to such exceedingly low levels that all of the SI units can now be linked to them.
...
The latest update of the values of the fundamental constants was authored by NIST's Peter Mohr, David Newell and Barry Taylor, who lead the international Task Group on Fundamental Constants of the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA). This task group updates the values every four years. The new quantities represent the latest comprehensive adjustment of values of the constants. In the summer of 2017, the task group will perform a special update to produce the final values for four fundamental constants to be adopted in the fall of 2018 by an international body known as the General Conference on Weights and Measures (Conférence Générale des Poids et Mesures, or CGPM).
...
Examples of fundamental constants range from the magnitude of the elementary charge of a single electron or proton to the extraordinary number of particles in one mole of a substance, described by the Avogadro constant. Another example is the Planck constant, a quantity at the heart of quantum physics that will be used to redefine the kilogram as an invariant property of nature instead of a standard platinum-iridium cylinder.

The evaluation and update reduce the uncertainties in both the Planck and Avogadro constants by almost four times compared to the previous evaluation, to just 12 parts per billion. These uncertainties decreased by reconciling measurements in different "watt-balance" devices around the world and new highly accurate X-ray measurements of a softball-sized sphere of silicon that is a nearly perfect crystal and is made almost entirely of the same isotope of silicon (99.9995 percent silicon-28). The update reduces the relative uncertainty by almost two times, to 0.6 parts per million, for the Boltzmann constant, which can be used to determine the amount of energy in a gas at a certain temperature.

Related reporting.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 29 2016, @03:26PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 29 2016, @03:26PM (#434495)
    Yes, not all all infinities are the same. While you might think that there is no difference between the number of integers and the number of real numbers, it can be proved that it is impossible to construct a function that will map all of the integers to all of the reals. You’ll “run” out of integers before you can touch all of the reals. That is, while both sets are “infinite”, there are in some sense “more” real numbers than there are integers!
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 29 2016, @06:21PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 29 2016, @06:21PM (#434586)

    Not only is there more than one infinity, there are even infinitely many infinities. Indeed, there are more infinities than there are real numbers!

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 29 2016, @08:09PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 29 2016, @08:09PM (#434656)

      now you're just fucking with me.

      reference, just in case: https://xkcd.com/179/ [xkcd.com]