Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Snow on Thursday December 01 2016, @06:34AM   Printer-friendly
from the head-in-the-sand dept.

Just before the dawn of the Trump administration, journalism in Washington, DC, faces an existential crisis -- but virtually no one in the profession is willing to diagnose it.

Here it is: For the first time, words don't matter. In August, as a guest on MSNBC's Meet the Press Daily, I noted that voters take Donald Trump seriously but not literally, while journalists take him literally, but not seriously.

[...] And journalists keep falling for it because they, like politicians, over-value words -- and they are now covering a politician who does not. President-elect Trump still takes the same cavalier approach to verbal description as he would in hawking a condo tower that's yet to be designed. And more than enough voters don't seem to mind. Trump has spent a career interacting with journalists, but as the first president never to serve in the military, the cabinet, or another public office before his election to the White House, he's never been immersed in the word culture that drives political journalism. [...] Most recently, when Trump announced he had chosen South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley to be his ambassador to the United Nations, journalists raced to re-tweet a March rant from Trump in which he said the people of South Carolina should be embarrassed by her.

[...] Writing endless columns on this or that flip-flop based on Trump's conflicting rhetoric is wasting the time of the readers and viewers who have decided that's not what matters with this particular President-elect. [...] If the press covers Trump the way it covered prior presidents -- too literally -- it may find its own customers take journalism itself a lot less seriously.

Source: CNN


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 01 2016, @12:47PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 01 2016, @12:47PM (#435404)

    Forget about the fact that the President-elect has paid $0 in Federal taxes for 20 years, by claiming a tax writeoff on other people's lost money that his own lawyers advised him not to take.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 01 2016, @02:40PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 01 2016, @02:40PM (#435437)

    OK, he did pay no taxes. But to compensate, he did it for a very long time. :-)

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 01 2016, @04:58PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 01 2016, @04:58PM (#435515)

    Forget about the fact that the President-elect has paid $0 in Federal taxes for 20 years

    Unless you work for the IRS or are Trump's accountant, I don't know how you can claim this to be a fact.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 01 2016, @05:56PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 01 2016, @05:56PM (#435542)

      He confirmed it during the second debate by replying that he didn't pay any taxes "because I'm smart". And his campaign didn't issue a correction afterwards, as it did on the topic of H1-B for example.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 02 2016, @02:39AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 02 2016, @02:39AM (#435776)

        Umm... have you heard of the word "Boasting"?

        I'm amused of the cognitive dissonance occuring here. On one hand folks call him a liar, ego-maniac, attention whore, talking out his arse, etc... yet when it is apparent he's doing just that you take it literally...