Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday November 30 2016, @07:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the what-does-watson-think dept.

The CEO of IBM wrote an open letter to Trump soon after the election. IBM had a long tradition of staying out of politics, but I don't see any way to interpret this letter that isn't some sort of endorsement of Trump's administration, partly because it barely alludes to the latest buzz-phrase "cognitive solutions in the cloud", At the optimistic end, maybe it's just saying IBM doesn't care as long as Trump lets the corporation make bigger profits, but at the pessimistic end it could be taken as a warning to IBM's employees and business partners to keep their mouths shut if they don't like the Donald.

Has your employer done anything along these lines? I'm guessing that Ginny Rometty's letter was emailed to all hands and posted on the intranet, as well as the public posting at https://www.ibm.com/blogs/policy/ibm-ceo-ginni-romettys-letter-u-s-president-elect/ for everyone. Can anyone inside IBM confirm? If you've gotten something along these lines from your employer, do you care to speculate about why? Or even say how it made you feel?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by jmorris on Wednesday November 30 2016, @04:31PM

    by jmorris (4844) on Wednesday November 30 2016, @04:31PM (#434976)

    That letter is just an introduction to the new administration and a brief outline of products and services IBM thinks the incoming Administration might want to look at. A corporation in the business of selling products and services looking to maintain and develop the relationship with one of its biggest accounts as that account changes leadership. Who ever head of such a thing! Obviously this is another sign of impending fascism; remember IBM sold to Nazis, so obviously they are secret Nazis just like Trump. Do you morons ever listen to yourselves?

    To compare that to horrid behavior like the GrubHub idiot is idiocy.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 30 2016, @04:55PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 30 2016, @04:55PM (#434993)

    I doubt Trump read past the beginning of the third paragraph, which started with "I am writing to offer ideas that I believe will help achieve the aspiration you articulated and that can advance a national agenda in a time of profound change." He briefly skimmed the rest and tossed it aside.

    As others have mentioned, this is just a courtesy call to reduce the chance of Trump making an example of their company, like he did with Ford and Carrier/UTC.

    Trump is a global capitalist at heart, look at his 50-year record in business. He doesn't give a shit about American workers. But, he did make a lot of promises during the campaign, and he wants to be re-elected, so he can't just blow off all the things he said.

  • (Score: 2) by jcross on Wednesday November 30 2016, @05:01PM

    by jcross (4009) on Wednesday November 30 2016, @05:01PM (#434998)

    Yeah, a lot of the letter can be read that way, but I find it hard to avoid reading the following paragraph as anything other than a plea to escape punishment, coming from a company that's known to have outsourced a shit ton of jobs:

    "Mr. President-elect, IBM’s roots are in the United States. We are investing, hiring, and continuing to reinvent our company for long-term competitiveness. At more than 50 major locations across the country, we hired more U.S. employees last year than in the previous five years. We are opening new innovation centers and business units across the country. We are proud of the work we do here in the United States, just as we are proud of the work we do in more than 175 countries around the world."

    I mean why exactly does that need to be said?

    • (Score: 2) by jmorris on Wednesday November 30 2016, @05:18PM

      by jmorris (4844) on Wednesday November 30 2016, @05:18PM (#435006)

      Do you even read the headlines? It isn't a state secret that Trump ran on a platform of being against outsourcing, offshoring, etc. Trump is not making a secret that he wants to help create jobs here, not elsewhere. So it makes perfect sense that any sales pitch, and that is what this letter is, would be sure to talk up their hiring here in the U.S. as a way to assuage those concerns.

      • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 30 2016, @06:18PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 30 2016, @06:18PM (#435038)

        Its also not a state secret that he's backed out of pretty much every single campaign promise already, and he's still not even close to taking office, so your thinking he's going to stick to any of them is at best denialism, at work delusion.

      • (Score: 2) by jcross on Wednesday November 30 2016, @07:48PM

        by jcross (4009) on Wednesday November 30 2016, @07:48PM (#435084)

        Oh I fully agree. But my guess is that they have a bit more to lose than just failing to sell contracts to the US government. Trump's administration could easily tilt policy against the outsourcing strategy they've been pursuing in recent years, which really has screwed over their stateside workforce. To me all the crap about their futuristic high-tech offerings sounds like padding around the more essential message of "please don't hurt us, we love America". I'm only disputing that this letter is about winning more, rather than losing less. And hey, I'm all for IBM taking some well-deserved punishment here, and it doesn't smell much like impending fascism to me. Maybe more like natural consequences.

        • (Score: 1) by shanen on Thursday December 01 2016, @04:24AM

          by shanen (6084) on Thursday December 01 2016, @04:24AM (#435268) Journal

          Well, I definitely agree with your comments about outsourcing. My last dealings with Big Blue mostly involved substituting cheap chopped Chinese chicken labor on short-term contracts for expensive local people... However, that doesn't make much sense to me as the motivation here. Trump don't care, but if I were still closely involved with IBM, then I'd feel nervous about continuing to doubt Trump's competence, let alone his honesty. Or maybe I just hate liars too much? (Not just Trump, btw.)

          Lots of ACs around, though I haven't seen any reason for their anonymity. No one has come out and said anything about their own employer getting on board the Trump train.

          --
          #1 Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice{5} ≠ (Beer^4 | Speech) and your negative mods prove you are a narrow prick.