Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday November 30 2016, @01:54PM   Printer-friendly
from the you-can-never-have-too-many-offsite-backups-eh dept.

The Internet Archive plans to create a backup of its data in Canada in response to the election of Donald Trump as President of the United States:

The Internet Archive, a nonprofit that saves copies of old web pages, is creating a backup of its database in Canada, in response to the election of Donald Trump. "On November 9th in America, we woke up to a new administration promising radical change," the organization wrote in a blogpost explaining the move. "It was a firm reminder that institutions like ours, built for the long-term, need to design for change."

[...] The move will cost millions, according to the Internet Archive, which is soliciting donations. In their post, the Internet Archive justified its decision to backup its data in Canada, claiming that Trump could threaten an open internet. "For us, it means keeping our cultural materials safe, private and perpetually accessible. It means preparing for a Web that may face greater restrictions."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Wednesday November 30 2016, @10:28PM

    by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Wednesday November 30 2016, @10:28PM (#435164)

    (1) destroying or damaging a U.S. flag with the primary purpose and intent to incite or produce imminent violence or a breach of the peace;

    That's ridiculous. If people see you burning a flag and react violently, that was their own choice; your intentions do not matter because what you actually did does not change either way and your intentions cannot magically force other people to react in any particular way. I know the US doesn't believe in freedom or personal responsibility, but it's still sad to see this kind of thinking. And why just a U.S. flag? What was the point of this nonsense?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by J053 on Thursday December 01 2016, @12:10AM

    by J053 (3532) <{dakine} {at} {shangri-la.cx}> on Thursday December 01 2016, @12:10AM (#435209) Homepage
    The point was to shortstop a Constitutional Amendment being proposed at about the same time by the right wing. It worked.
    • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Thursday December 01 2016, @08:45AM

      by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Thursday December 01 2016, @08:45AM (#435342)

      That's a very charitable interpretation of their actions, and you could do that with pretty much any issue to make one party seem spotless.