Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday November 30 2016, @01:54PM   Printer-friendly
from the you-can-never-have-too-many-offsite-backups-eh dept.

The Internet Archive plans to create a backup of its data in Canada in response to the election of Donald Trump as President of the United States:

The Internet Archive, a nonprofit that saves copies of old web pages, is creating a backup of its database in Canada, in response to the election of Donald Trump. "On November 9th in America, we woke up to a new administration promising radical change," the organization wrote in a blogpost explaining the move. "It was a firm reminder that institutions like ours, built for the long-term, need to design for change."

[...] The move will cost millions, according to the Internet Archive, which is soliciting donations. In their post, the Internet Archive justified its decision to backup its data in Canada, claiming that Trump could threaten an open internet. "For us, it means keeping our cultural materials safe, private and perpetually accessible. It means preparing for a Web that may face greater restrictions."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by kurenai.tsubasa on Wednesday November 30 2016, @11:35PM

    by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Wednesday November 30 2016, @11:35PM (#435194) Journal

    1. Clinton is the lizard person. I'm hoping that's just metaphor, but you never know!

    2. Yes. Both Clinton and Trump were that horrendously bad (along with Stein and Johnson being exercises in futility) that the choice really did come down to that. Well, more I should say that the choice came down to my usual exercise in futility by throwing the lever for the L candidate vs. maybe insignificantly nudging the result towards unlocking the “female head of state” achievement. Clinton also carried a distinct risk of all-out nuclear war, but on the other hand I might have been able to buy cannabis legally in my own state for a month or two before the bombs fell.

    I don't think we're going to see too much in the way of anti-LGBT policies. I guess we'll see once the dust settles. If anything, gay marriage will devolve to states rights (which I guess is better than the federal government being in the marriage business).

    One specific example is that has the interesting effect of kicking the conflict between my state constitution's DOMA provisions vs. an eyebrow-raising decision by the Supreme Court down the road. I'm still waiting to see if conservatives are appeased this year or whether “merry Christmas” is something you yell at people in anger again this year. A conflict like that could turn the holiday greeting from an expression of hatred and rage to actual blows.

    Trump's already said he's not in favor of bathroom laws also. I don't think LGBT stuff was much of a concern with Trump vs. Clinton.

    Cannabis was probably about the only actual policy factor I could find that mattered to me. Nobody knows what Trump thinks, but Clinton would have at least continued Obama's policies to let the states “experiment” (experiment must be a modern way of saying federalism).

    Now, what really has me worried is a Republican congress. I'm also sort of worried with Trump that in addition to being “on punishment,” women might decide to fuck with my medical care once more. But if Trump and the Rs repeal Obamneycare and open up mail order from overseas pharmacies again, women can do whatever the fuck they want because I won't be at the mercy of some bullshit system any more. If we keep Obamneycare, I will probably will get fucked with again in retaliation when Roe v. Wade is overturned.

  • (Score: 3, Touché) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday November 30 2016, @11:48PM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Wednesday November 30 2016, @11:48PM (#435204) Journal

    The vice-president-elect thinks you can be "fixed" with drugs. No problem there, I'm sure.

    • (Score: 1) by kurenai.tsubasa on Thursday December 01 2016, @04:39AM

      by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Thursday December 01 2016, @04:39AM (#435270) Journal

      Yeah granted that's disconcerting, but the worst he did in Indiana is make it so that wedding cake bakers can refuse certain people's money.

      (Why they would do so is beyond me, like literally in the sense I don't get their connection to this Reichsführer Jesus in the sky. While I haven't found Mr. Right yet, so maybe I speak from naïveté, I can't imagine finding somebody to bake a wedding cake could possibly be anywhere near as difficult as finding a doctor. And there are plenty of rituals that don't involve cake that would be acceptable. Maybe the cake is a lie!)

      I can think he's a vile person (ignorance can be easily cured, but people like him are not ignorant) without being too worried what he'd even be able to get away with. I'm expecting a lot of meh for the next four years. Discrimination laws just create angst to nod at AC.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 01 2016, @03:33AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 01 2016, @03:33AM (#435257)

    Trump’s Justice Department could undermine hate crime protections for LGBT people and withdraw Obama’s directive to schools not to discriminate against transgender students. Trump could also rescind Obama’s executive order prohibiting federal contractors from discriminating against LGBT employees, or support legislation that allows employment discrimination.

    https://theintercept.com/2016/11/28/trump-may-not-be-anti-gay-but-much-of-his-senior-staff-is/ [theintercept.com]