Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday December 03 2016, @02:48AM   Printer-friendly
from the runningon-outium-ofine-ideasium dept.

Elements 113, 115, 117, and 118 are now formally named nihonium (Nh), moscovium (Mc), tennessine (Ts), and oganesson (Og)

https://iupac.org/iupac-announces-the-names-of-the-elements-113-115-117-and-118/

In concordance with and following the earlier reports that the claims for discovery of these elements have been fulfilled [...], the discoverers have been invited to propose names. Keeping with tradition, the newly discovered elements have been named after a place or geographical region, or a scientist. The ending of the names also reflects and maintains historical and chemical consistency: "-ium" for elements 113 and 115 and as for all new elements of groups 1 to 16, "-ine" for element 117 and belonging to group 17 and "-on" for element 118 element belonging to group 18.[3] The recommendations will be published in the IUPAC journal Pure and Applied Chemistry* (http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pac-2016-0501).

[...] The exploration of new elements continues, and scientists are searching for elements beyond the seventh row of the periodic table. IUPAC and the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP) are establishing a new joint working group which task will be to examine the criteria used to verify claims for the discovery of new elements.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by jmorris on Sunday December 04 2016, @05:37AM

    by jmorris (4844) on Sunday December 04 2016, @05:37AM (#436782)

    Ok, lets look at your examples. The laser was invented in the 1950s and practical applications appeared almost instantly. By the 1980s lasers were in consumer products, the Compact Disc and Laserdisc being notable examples. The auto was an obvious success with the model T in 1908 and was one of the defining products of the 20th Century. Artificial isotopes date back to the start of the atomic era. Several of the early discoveries were useful, but once we got to the ones with lifetimes measured in milliseconds, it is rare to read of actual measurements of the element itself, just examining the decay products.

    I really do wonder at the inability for a lot of folks to process the idea of limits. Resources are not infinite. Not money, not phisical things, not skilled researchers. Some lines of research cost more of these resources than others. And while it is harder to make predictions about the possible unknowns in scientific research it is possible to say some lines of research are more likely than others to bear fruit in the next few decades than others. With a current U.S. debt of 20 Trillion dollars on the just the primary accounts, plus the off book liabilities, and every developed country in pretty much the same bad situation, the idea of targeting research funded by a govermnent in such dire fiscal condition to only lines most likely to create sufficient economic growth to bring in enough revenue to justify it should not be controversial.

    But it obviously is. Anonymous Conservative's blog [ipage.com] and book [castaliahouse.com] provide the clearest explanation of this thought process I have seen to date. That in r selected people, the very idea that limits exist causes them mental discomfort. That they will reject the concept if at all possible. As you and others have done, you don't attempt to justify this particular line of research, you attack my premise, you attack the very idea that limits exist as a subject for reasonable discussion.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3