Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Saturday December 03 2016, @01:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the ARES-is-a-useful-engine dept.

The easiest way to squirrel away electricity in times of plenty, for use when it is scarce, is to pump water uphill with it. Such pumped storage is widely employed where local geography and hydrology permit, but it does need two basins, at different heights, to act as reservoirs, and a supply of water to fill them.

[...] Where geography does not favour pumped storage, though, the search is on for alternatives. These range from giant batteries, via caverns filled with compressed air, to huge flywheels made of carbon-fibre composites. But one firm looking into the matter eschews all these. It has stuck with the logic of pumped storage, which is to move large amounts of matter up and down hills. The difference is that in its case the matter is solid.

The firm in question calls itself ARES, which stands for Advanced Rail Energy Storage.

[...] The rocks stand in for the water in a pumped-storage system. They are carried up- and downhill by a train that is thus the equivalent of the turbines. The track the train runs on is equivalent to the tunnel. And the motors that drive the train act, like the electrical kit of a pumped-storage turbine, as generators when they run in reverse as the train rolls backwards downhill, pulled by gravity.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Saturday December 03 2016, @08:20PM

    by frojack (1554) on Saturday December 03 2016, @08:20PM (#436624) Journal

    You can't condemn the concept by the limitations of the demonstrator project.

    They plan to elevate many more weights than would be used in a single downhill run, they warehouse these at the top, and move them to the downhill run as needed, potentially supplying a many hours of electricity generation.

    As for the tracks, once the roadbed it built, you simply add more rails and wheel trucks. You are not limited to two rails.
    You won't be building this on swampy ground, so the weight bearing issue as manageable. People with lesser technology have been doing this kind of moving since the Pyramids and Stonehenge.(/a> [securityscale.com]

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Monday December 05 2016, @06:12AM

    by bob_super (1357) on Monday December 05 2016, @06:12AM (#437069)

    The heavier the trains, the more power you get. The more tracks you build, the more power you get.
    This requires a massive amount of land and a lot of concrete, i.e. a massive amount of water, if only once.
    Ant then you gotta maintain your oversized infrastructure, including you giant mobile engine/generators and their catenary/cables. And you get no savings as this is so site-sensitive (and automatically distant from the power users) that it won't scale to more than a few systems, ever.

    It's not that it doesn't work, but I wouldn't put my money on it.