Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday December 04 2016, @03:56AM   Printer-friendly
from the lets-start-the-monitoring-with-all-those-in-power dept.

The FBI, National Security Agency and CIA are likely to gain expanded surveillance powers under President-elect Donald Trump and a Republican-controlled Congress, a prospect that has privacy advocates and some lawmakers trying to mobilize opposition.

Trump's first two choices to head law enforcement and intelligence agencies -- Republican Senator Jeff Sessions for attorney general and Republican Representative Mike Pompeo for director of the Central Intelligence Agency -- are leading advocates for domestic government spying at levels not seen since the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Police state surveillance is only bad when the other party does it.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Marand on Sunday December 04 2016, @11:27PM

    by Marand (1081) on Sunday December 04 2016, @11:27PM (#437008) Journal

    It's not just the system, it's the people you voted for.

    How do you figure? The 2016 presidential election did a pretty good job of showing how it doesn't particularly matter what the people really want. The system is already busted in a way that inevitably degrades into only two viable parties and defensive voting, and of those parties, the (D) side had already picked its candidate before she was officially accepted and did everything possible to skew things in her favour regardless of what its people wanted. I didn't follow it as closely, but the (R) side also seemed to be doing the same kind of thing, but in reverse: rather than trying to push its favoured candidate, it seemed hellbent on blocking Trump with an "anyone but him!!!" approach that ultimately failed.

    As a result, we ended up with a truly baffling election where Republicans were constantly slagging off their own candidate while the Democrats were force-feeding a narrative about how their intensely unlikeable candidate was mankind's beloved saviour. Beating Trump should have been an easy victory -- their leaks indicated the Democrats considered him such, in fact -- and if they hadn't interfered with their own processes it probably would have been.

    Considered all together, it looks like what happened this year is the result of a select few attempting to manipulate a flawed system and the general public going "fuck you" and doing the opposite out of spite, rather than an actual representation of what people genuinely wanted. Granted, that's not a particularly good strategy for getting good changes made, but telling angry people to stop being angry doesn't really work.

    It also didn't help that, due to the two-party nature, the voters got stuck having to choose between endorsing the Democrats' manipulative shenanigans or picking the Republicans' potentially self-destructive option. For someone like me that isn't entrenched in the D vs. R tribalism, there was no good choice. When you're offered a choice between a pound of shit in a blue bag or in a red bag, it doesn't matter what you choose, you're still getting shit.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by tisI on Sunday December 11 2016, @02:31PM

    by tisI (5866) on Sunday December 11 2016, @02:31PM (#439975)

    The entire thing, election, was rigged, manipulated.
    Took time. Lots of money.
    We now got the biggest batch of cowards and crooks gathered in one group, all at one time.
    Nothing good will come from this. Warm your KY

    --
    "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself."