Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Thursday December 08 2016, @05:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the gears-of-war dept.

David Swanson, author of "War is a Lie", writes via CounterPunch:

The facts [of the Pearl Harbor story] do not support the mythology. The United States government did not need to make Japan a junior partner in imperialism, did not need to fuel an arms race, did not need to support Nazism and fascism (as some of the biggest U.S. corporations did right through the war), did not need to provoke Japan, did not need to join the war in Asia or Europe, and was not surprised by the attack on Pearl Harbor. For support of each of these statements, keep reading.

[...] Churchill's fervent hope for years before the U.S. entry into the war was that Japan would attack the United States. This would permit the United States (not legally, but politically) to fully enter World War II in Europe, as its president wanted to do, as opposed to merely providing weaponry and assisting in the targeting of submarines as it had been doing. On December 7, 1941, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt drew up a declaration of war on both Japan and Germany, but decided it wouldn't work and went with Japan alone. Germany quickly declared war on the United States, possibly in hopes that Japan would declare war on the Soviet Union.

Getting into the war was not a new idea in the Roosevelt White House. FDR had tried lying to the U.S. public about U.S. ships including the Greer and the Kerny, which had been helping British planes track German submarines, but which Roosevelt pretended had been innocently attacked. Roosevelt also lied that he had in his possession a secret Nazi map planning the conquest of South America, as well as a secret Nazi plan for replacing all religions with Nazism. The map was of the quality of Karl Rove's "proof" that Iraq was buying uranium in Niger.

And yet, the people of the United States didn't buy the idea of going into another war until Pearl Harbor, by which point Roosevelt had already instituted the draft, activated the National Guard, created a huge Navy in two oceans, traded old destroyers to England in exchange for the lease of its bases in the Caribbean and Bermuda, and--just 11 days before the "unexpected" attack, and five days before FDR expected it--he had secretly ordered the creation (by Henry Field) of a list of every Japanese and Japanese-American person in the United States.

[...] On November 15th, Army Chief of Staff George Marshall briefed the media on something we do not remember as "the Marshall Plan". In fact we don't remember it at all. "We are preparing an offensive war against Japan", Marshall said, asking the journalists to keep it a secret, which as far as I know they dutifully did.

[...] Congresswoman Jeannette Rankin (R-MT), the first woman ever elected to Congress, and who had voted against World War I, stood alone in opposing World War II [...] found that the Economic Defense Board had gotten economic sanctions under way less than a week after the Atlantic Conference [of August 1941]. On December 2, 1941, the New York Times had reported, in fact, that Japan had been "cut off from about 75 percent of her normal trade by the Allied blockade". Rankin also cited the statement of Lieutenant Clarence E. Dickinson, U.S.N., in the Saturday Evening Post of October 10, 1942, that on November 28, 1941, nine days before the attack, Vice Admiral William F. Halsey, Jr., (he of the catchy slogan "Kill Japs! Kill Japs!") had given instructions to him and others to "shoot down anything we saw in the sky and to bomb anything we saw on the sea".

The article is very detailed and shows repeatedly the duplicity of those who have claimed that the strike on Pearl Harbor was a "surprise".


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Thursday December 08 2016, @11:27PM

    by Thexalon (636) on Thursday December 08 2016, @11:27PM (#438924)

    Yes, the big ships dock at big ports, but what good reason is/was there for having them ALL in port ALL at the same time?

    1. They can (and did) support each other in case of attack.
    2. They can easily transfer personnel between ships.
    3. They can take advantage of land-based defenses and the barriers around the port to fight.
    4. They can be easily supplied.
    5. It doesn't require any fuel to leave them in port.
    6. The sailors like shore leave, all other things being equal.
    7. The US was in negotiations with the Japanese at the time, and there was a significant chance of a deal being cut. Having your fleet out and about is a provocation.
    8. Ships sunk in port are much easier to salvage, resurface and repair. 13 of the 16 ships hit would return to service during the war.

    The main reason the US was caught by surprise is that they expected the Japanese to hit them in the Philippines first, not in Hawaii, in part because the Philippines were much closer to their bases of operations.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 09 2016, @02:07AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 09 2016, @02:07AM (#438967)

    the US [...] expected the Japanese to hit them in the Philippines first

    You left out the good part: (Later that day). [wikipedia.org]

    As dawn moved westward across the Pacific (and the International Date Line), daylight airstrikes followed [...] on Wake Island, [...] on Guam, [...] on Davao [in the Philippines], [...] on Baguio [in the Philippines], and on Clark Field [in the Philippines]

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]]

  • (Score: 2) by edIII on Friday December 09 2016, @02:12AM

    by edIII (791) on Friday December 09 2016, @02:12AM (#438968)

    Don't forget that the primary reason why it's so easy to believe that our leaders betrayed us, and those soldiers, is hindsight.

    From the Tuskegee experiments and onward, there have been many reasons for us to distrust the U.S military command's commitment to the troops. Those troops were expendable in order to win a larger war.

    It's so easy to believe when you view history as one long running game that the Elite's play.

    --
    Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.