Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Friday December 09 2016, @01:01PM   Printer-friendly
from the vape-em-if-you-got-em dept.

The U.S. surgeon general has warned against surging e-cigarette use among teenagers, calling it a "major public health concern" in a new report:

The U.S. surgeon general is calling e-cigarettes an emerging public health threat to the nation's youth. In a report being released Thursday, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy acknowledged a need for more research into the health effects of "vaping," but said e-cigarettes aren't harmless and too many teens are using them. "My concern is e-cigarettes have the potential to create a whole new generation of kids who are addicted to nicotine," Murthy told The Associated Press. "If that leads to the use of other tobacco-related products, then we are going to be moving backward instead of forward."

[...] Federal figures show that last year, 16 percent of high school students reported at least some use of e-cigarettes - even some who say they've never smoked a conventional cigarette. While not all contain nicotine, Murthy's report says e-cigarettes are the most commonly used tobacco-related product among youth. Nicotine is bad for a developing brain no matter how it's exposed, Murthy said. "Your kids are not an experiment," he says in a public service announcement being released with the report.

It's already illegal to sell e-cigarettes to minors. Earlier this year, the Food and Drug Administration issued new rules that, for the first time, will require makers of nicotine-emitting devices to begin submitting their ingredients for regulators to review.

Also at USA Today, NYT, The Hill, and The Washington Post.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 10 2016, @05:45AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 10 2016, @05:45AM (#439598)

    Yay for autistic literalism.

    Thanks for adding more pseudoscience to the discussion. You're not a psychologist or anything related and have absolutely no place using terms like "autistic" here. Stop using such terms as generic insults.

    In any case, don't say that someone is being too literal because you pulled statistics out of nowhere and they called you out on it. Instead, try being correct so that fewer people will feel the need to argue with you. This is entirely your fault.

    Otherwise learn how to be a normal human being.

    So being a "normal human being" includes making up statistics and passing them off as fact, and then insulting people who correct you? I don't want to be a "normal human being", then.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 10 2016, @07:20AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 10 2016, @07:20AM (#439617)

    > You're not a psychologist or anything related and have absolutely no place using terms like "autistic" here.

    Getting your panties in a twist because I'm using words in a way you don't approve of has got to be the most autistic thing ever. The fact that you have admitted to being on the spectrum kind of undermines your whole point too.

    > So being a "normal human being" includes making up statistics and passing them off as fact, and then insulting people who correct you? I

    I have yet to see any correction at all. Just someone who thinks literalism is the only source of meaning. Someone so autistic that the concepts of hyperbole and casual communication are incomprehensible.