Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday December 10 2016, @11:55AM   Printer-friendly
from the I-just-don't-know-what-to-believe-anymore dept.

From rt.com:

Facing threats of legal action, the Washington Post has been forced to add an editor's note distancing the paper from a dubious website, PropOrNot, which it had initially endorsed as a group of nonpartisan experts on "Russian propaganda."

The Post came under fire on social media for its provocative hit piece which claimed that "Russia's increasingly sophisticated propaganda campaign" actually influenced the US presidential election.

[...] Jim Moody, an attorney representing the website, stressed in a letter to the Washington Post on Sunday that the newspaper "did not provide even a single example of 'fake news' allegedly distributed or promoted by Naked Capitalism or indeed any of the 200 sites on the PropOrNot blacklist."

From fair.org:

That a group of Cold Warrior hacks would publish such a blacklist is not a surprise; that one of the most established names in American news would uncritically parrot it was. Its reporting, writing-up and referencing is a prime example of how fake real news on real fake news spreads without question.

USA Today (11/25/16), Gizmodo (11/25/16), PBS (11/25/16), The Daily Beast (11/25/16), Slate (11/25/16), AP (11/25/16) The Verge (11/25/16) and NPR (11/25/16) all uncritically wrote up the Post's most incendiary claims with little or minimal pushback. Gizmodo was so giddy its original headline had to be changed from "Research Confirms That Russia Played a Major Role in Spreading Fake News" to "Research Suggests That Russia Played a Major Role in Spreading Fake News," presumably after some polite commenters pointed out that the research "confirmed" nothing of the sort.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by quintessence on Saturday December 10 2016, @10:31PM

    by quintessence (6227) on Saturday December 10 2016, @10:31PM (#439816)

    What's interesting is that the entire review was lead [washingtonpost.com]by James Clapper [youtube.com]

    In light of Clinton having a private email server, allegations of Russian hacking, lying about mass surveillance, and an overly broad law being proposed; the whole thing just reeks.

    And especially with all of the concerns over Trump, giving him that much power while arguing that fake news needs to be controlled is absurd, and parallels nicely with the lead up to the Patriot Act.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 11 2016, @12:13AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 11 2016, @12:13AM (#439839)

    Did you just cop to being a truther?

    Jesus christ, that explains a lot...

    What soylent needs is a way to tag other users to help keep track of who are the gullible conspiracy sheeple.

    I'd actually create an account and use it if that were an option