Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Saturday December 10 2016, @03:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the [when]-will-the-pendulum-swing-back? dept.

A newly released World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) report has found that the scale of Russian doping at the 2012 London and 2014 Sochi Olympic Games, as well as other events such as the 2013 World Championships in Athletics, was much larger than previously thought:

International sports's antidoping watchdog on Friday laid out mountainous evidence that for years Russian officials orchestrated a doping program at the Olympics and other competitions that involved or benefited 1,000 athletes in 30 sports. The findings intensified pressure on the International Olympic Committee to revisit Russia's standings at the 2014 Winter Games and penalize the nation ahead of the 2018 edition.

The evidence, published by the World Anti-Doping Agency, was the coda to a set of investigations conducted by the Canadian lawyer Richard McLaren, who issued a damning report in July that prompted more than 100 Russian athletes to be barred from the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro. The follow-up report outlined competitions that had been tainted by years of extraordinary preparations, ensuring Russia's dominance at the 2012 Summer Olympics in London, the 2013 track and field world championships in Moscow and the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, the "apex" of Russia's cheating at which it took advantage of controlling drug-testing.

The subterfuge included using table salt and Nescafé instant coffee granules to conceal tainted urine, the report said. Some samples were clearly fraudulent: Urine provided by two female hockey players at the Sochi Games contained male DNA. Yet Mr. McLaren suggested that the full extent of the cheating might never be known. "It is impossible to know just how deep and how far back this conspiracy goes," he said Friday, calling the "immutable facts" of his report clear but far from comprehensive. "For years, international sports competitions have unknowingly been hijacked by the Russians."

WADA report (151 pages) and statement. More documents available here. Also at USA Today (opinion column):

The only way to restore integrity to the Olympic movement is with a testing agency that is not beholden to the International Olympic Committee or its sports federations. Require the respective Olympic committees to sign on, agreeing to uninhibited and unannounced out-of-competition testing. Insist that the sports federations cede responsibility for sanctions.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by zocalo on Saturday December 10 2016, @04:57PM

    by zocalo (302) on Saturday December 10 2016, @04:57PM (#439723)
    Firstly, I don't think people whose sole interest in sport is in spectating or making money off the actual athletes should have much say in this - they won't be the ones putting their health, and possibly lives, at risk by taking the drugs. Still, it does initially sound reasonable if you are liberal minded enough to allow doing this in the first place; many countries are not, so you are already going to be whittling down the field of potential competitors - not exactly in keeping with the supposed Olympic spirit of being open to all. You also need to consider that many countries start seriously training their star athletes from a very young age, certainly well before they are old enough to understand the implications of doping, and in some sports - gymnastics for instance - it's not at all unusual for athletes to have peaked before they even reach the age of consent/majority (setting aside that this varies from country to country and is generally based on physical rather than mental attributes).

    So, let's say we agree to determine a global age of consent for this, then limit competition to those who have consented only. At what point does peer pressure *really* become a non-issue, keeping in mind that it is going to come with the potential of large amounts of fame and money to sweeten the deal? Many people are not really fully mentally mature until they are much older than typical ages of consent/majority, and you could even argue that some never really get there. You'd have to start doping at some point to make it effective, but the clock is ticking all the time on when the athlete is just going to be physically past it, so you're automatically into diminishing returns - leave it too late to start doping and there's no point, start too soon and you could argue the athelete wasn't really mature enough to fully understand the implications.

    You've also got the legal and moral minefield to contend with. Some countries are going to be able to abuse the hell out of their athletes with all sorts of dubious drugs, whereas others that might allow some doping will still be so severely limited in the drugs they could use by the legal and moral issues surrounding them it's likely they would not be able to effectively compete. That's going to mean the field is so uneven that any notion of fair competition is going to be largely moot, so unless you can also figure some kind of weighting system like they use in the Paralympics (and good luck with that, given how many different drugs are likely be tried and then abandonned), then what's the point?
    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2