Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Saturday December 10 2016, @06:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the less-is-more dept.

Sweden is so good at recycling that, for several years, it has imported rubbish from other countries to keep its recycling plants going. Less than 1 per cent of Swedish household waste was sent to landfill last year or any year since 2011.

Well, it's not quite so idyllic as that (it sounds as if they're incinerating), but it's far, far ahead of the competition. As reported in The Independent (from a solidly British perspective, naturally) :

Why are we sending waste to Sweden? Their system is so far ahead because of a culture of looking after the environment. Sweden was one of the first countries to implement a heavy tax on fossil fuels in 1991 and now sources almost half its electricity from renewables.

[...] Over time, Sweden has implemented a cohesive national recycling policy so that even though private companies undertake most of the business of importing and burning waste, the energy goes into a national heating network to heat homes through the freezing Swedish winter. “That's a key reason that we have this district network, so we can make use of the heating from the waste plants. [...]”

So they don't actually recycle, but they barely need landfills, and “In the UK, each local authority has its own system, making it difficult for residents to be confident about what they can recycle and where.” Sounds like the U.S., dunnit?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 11 2016, @01:55AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 11 2016, @01:55AM (#439857)

    I don't think you know what "sic" means.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by art guerrilla on Sunday December 11 2016, @02:37AM

    by art guerrilla (3082) on Sunday December 11 2016, @02:37AM (#439866)

    "Sic may also be used derisively, to call attention to the original writer's spelling mistakes or erroneous logic"

    in this case, i use it not exactly derisively, but that saying 'all' doesn't necessarily mean 'all'... it generally means 'acceptable limits of toxins', which is not really 'all', but we accept in a manner of speaking that below a certain threshold will constitute 'all'...

    more importantly than the grammar policing, is WHAT ARE THE SWEDES DOING to get -*ahem*- 'all' (sic) of the eee-vil stuff out of the smokestack...

    i also commonly use it when talking about "...'our' (sic) gummint...", because -ob- it ain't 'our' gummint at all... i guess theoretically you could say that is the original meaning of 'sic', as far as reporting it directly without correction : i *repeat without correction* the form of the state's propaganda that it is constantly inveighing the bromide of 'the people's (ie 'our') gummint', and am signifying both my (skeptical) repeating of that bromide, as well as my derisive take with the (sic) modifier... of course, i am also using it punnily as indicating 'our sick gummint'...

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 12 2016, @05:29PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 12 2016, @05:29PM (#440458)

      Nice explanation - unfortunately, it just confirms that you don't know what the means and/or its purpose. '(sic)' is used when quoting something to show that it is an accurate quote of something incorrect, so you can't use it when introducing information for the first time. An example of an accurate use would be to quote your entire post and follow it with '(sic)'