SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
After years of development, the standalone modification of Xonotic known as ChaosEsque Anthology has reached version 100.
The project has expanded Xonotic's original cast of 18 weapons to over 130 weapons, has added new textures and maps, as well as a list of other features including: city generation subsystem (with interiors), building subsystem (build buildings, furnishings, doors, blocks, the buildings have interiors and function similar to RTS buildables), marshaling subsystem, foliage subsystem, as well as mounted weapons and more vehicles. Hand-to-hand combat was added for those wishing for a Mortal Kombat feel in a free 3d video game.
More information can be found on the project's Linux Game Database page including the change log and download link of the ISO: https://lgdb.org/game/chaosesque-anthology
Source code can be found on SourceForge.
(Note: The ChaosEsque Anthology name was decided upon after input from the lead developer of Xonotic, many moons ago)
(Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Monday December 12 2016, @06:47PM
I'm sure they all handle noticeably uniquely.
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 12 2016, @10:18PM
Yea they do, because they're all based off of statistics for the actual weapons. Speed of the bullet, accuracy, penetration, etc. So how about you shut your fucking mouth cuck faggot.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 13 2016, @12:24AM
Look, the true tragedy is that it seems that you've put a lot of hard work into getting this game where it's at. While the graphics may not be 2016 AAA quality, I keep reading about all the features it has, and it sounds like it can put a lot of AAA games to shame on that basis.
Why do you feel the need to sabotage yourself this way?
I'm the AC that mentioned having a game on Steam up there. Why have you built such a recognizably infamous public persona? Don't you understand that whatever your religious theories are, most people simply don't want to be associated with your toxicity?
I mean, I don't know how you could backpedal at this point, but what lead you to this despite having so much drive and talent?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 13 2016, @01:14AM
Because that's the toll you pay.
I work on a hobby: I put whatever I want into and around it.
Including propaganda in-favor of my social and religious beliefs.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 13 2016, @02:25AM
Fascinating. Thank you for your candor.
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 12 2016, @10:22PM
Also you said you were sure they were all just skins on the same model you fucking piece of shit.
I showed they were all different models, and then you change the goal posts as if you were right.
If I ever met you I would beat the shit out of you you fucking pro-women's rights anti-marry-female-children cuck piece of fucking shit.
Smug piece of liberal cuck garbage. D__teronomy is right: your kind deserves death.
(Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Monday December 12 2016, @10:51PM
I could show you your reading comprehension failures but for somebody with such a frothing, raving, foulmouthed style of posting it would do little good.
Good day, sir. Please go get some psychological help, for your own good.
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 13 2016, @01:19AM
"I would imagine that a lot of them are more or less skins on another model that works almost exactly the same way. For when you absolutely must use that one obscure German submachine pistol only in general use in 1934-36."
Your only argument is the use of the weasel words "more or less", however that is contradicted by the inclusion of "on another model"
Thus if you were to claim "skins, more or less" includes 130 different 3d models, the fact that you specified "skins on another model" still would preclude that reading by any reasonable man (not women: women are not reasonable, and are traitors to their nations, and liars often).
(Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Tuesday December 13 2016, @05:21AM
You complain that I use an absolute statement, I point out I didn't, then you complain that I didn't use an absolute statement.
And replying to my same post 3 or 4 times as AC. Come on, dude; give it up. You're taking this whole thing waaaaay more seriously than I ever intended it.
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @02:35PM
You used weasel words so you could claim victory nomatter what.
Go and fuck yourself cuckold.
Trump Won btw.