SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the all-your-boink-detecting-mattresses-are-belong-to-us dept.
Arthur T Knackerbracket has found an interesting story over at The Register about regulating the security of IoT devices:
Washington DC think tank the Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology is calling for regulation on "negligence" in the design of internet-of-things (IoT) devices.
Researchers James Scott and Drew Spaniel point out in their report Rise of the Machines: The Dyn Attack Was Just a Practice Run [PDF] that IoT represents a threat that is only beginning to be understood.
The pair say the risk that regulation could stifle market-making IoT innovation (like the WiFi cheater-detection mattress) is outweighed by the need to stop feeding Shodan.
"National IoT regulation and economic incentives that mandate security-by-design are worthwhile as best practices, but regulation development faces the challenge of ... security-by-design without stifling innovation, and remaining actionable, implementable and binding," Scott and Spaniel say.
[...] State level regulation would be "disastrous" to markets and consumers alike.
Does the ability of a company to make money now outweigh the security of our digital homes and devices?
(Score: 2) by krishnoid on Monday December 12 2016, @04:19AM
Does the ability of a company to make money now outweigh the security of our digital homes and devices?
Now? Also, why would you think it's an either-or situation?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 12 2016, @04:38PM
If you reject being responsible for yourself, then you're inviting government to be responsible for you; that way leads to Tyranny.