Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday December 12 2016, @02:58AM   Printer-friendly
from the all-your-boink-detecting-mattresses-are-belong-to-us dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found an interesting story over at The Register about regulating the security of IoT devices:

Washington DC think tank the Institute for Critical Infrastructure Technology is calling for regulation on "negligence" in the design of internet-of-things (IoT) devices.

Researchers James Scott and Drew Spaniel point out in their report Rise of the Machines: The Dyn Attack Was Just a Practice Run [PDF] that IoT represents a threat that is only beginning to be understood.

The pair say the risk that regulation could stifle market-making IoT innovation (like the WiFi cheater-detection mattress) is outweighed by the need to stop feeding Shodan.

"National IoT regulation and economic incentives that mandate security-by-design are worthwhile as best practices, but regulation development faces the challenge of ... security-by-design without stifling innovation, and remaining actionable, implementable and binding," Scott and Spaniel say.

[...] State level regulation would be "disastrous" to markets and consumers alike.

Does the ability of a company to make money now outweigh the security of our digital homes and devices?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Monday December 12 2016, @01:20PM

    by LoRdTAW (3755) on Monday December 12 2016, @01:20PM (#440340) Journal

    Of course not and I pity the fool who buys any of the shit.

    The problem is they don't know they are fools. They simply see a cool remote controlled gadget and think about how cool and convenient it is. "Check this out, (taps phone, lights come on) How cool is that! Woah dude! thats sweet!" Never once thinking about how that IoT system works, only that it does cool stuff. They are blissfully unaware of its function. Shit, Amazon's echo has a slogan of "Always on, Always listening". Yet people freak out about spying Samsung TV's.

    But it isn't the big problem and won't be for a long time.

    That long time isn't as long as you think. I already have one friend with two Amazon echo's, Wink hub and has most of his homes lights controlled by the system. There are already plenty of Zwave/Zigbee light switches and bulbs on the market. It's only going to be a few more years before more and more people invest in these systems and they become more mainstream.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by jmorris on Monday December 12 2016, @03:39PM

    by jmorris (4844) on Monday December 12 2016, @03:39PM (#440392)

    Stupid needs to hurt, as pain is the only way most people are capable of learning. So no, I do not pity the fool who buys an Amazon Echo. Raise your hand if you don't already see the inevitable backlash that will see every Echo in a landfill. It listens to everything said in range of the mic. How long until a court order hits Amazon for access to the records we all know it keeps in perpetuity? Nobody sees that one coming? Really?