Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Monday December 12 2016, @10:59AM   Printer-friendly
from the time-for-brain-bleach dept.

Most people have wondered how censors can watch so much horrible, degrading stuff without be affected by it, especially the stuff that's so bad that ordinary people need to be protected from ever seeing it.

In what might be the first of its kind, a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) is claiming damages for the Post-traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD) he is suffering after years of exposure to child pornography.

Const. Michael Wardrope says he was exposed to disturbing videos, photographs, interviews and interrogations as a member of the child abuse and sexual offence unit in Surrey, B.C.

"His mental health was impacted by unescapable images and memories from the files he had worked on," says the lawsuit filed in B.C. Supreme Court.

Wardrope says in the court document he was "flattered" when he was recruited to the unit in 2009. But he says he told his bosses he had three young children, had to commute hours per day and didn't think viewing child porn would be healthy.

He alleges his supervisor assured him that overtime was uncommon and that the amount of child pornography that needed to be viewed was "very minimal and almost non-existent," as the work was, for the most part, interviewing children.

Eventually Wardrope suffered a mental breakdown, and the Mounties dragged their feet for ten months before transferring him to another unit.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 12 2016, @05:58PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 12 2016, @05:58PM (#440479)

    I'm not sure what that word is. I'd like to buy a vowel.

  • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 12 2016, @06:04PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 12 2016, @06:04PM (#440483)

    D_e_u_teronomy is censored on this website. You can't post if your post includes it.

    Which suggests the site owners should be killed in some cruel manner for being heritics.

    • (Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Monday December 12 2016, @06:26PM

      by LoRdTAW (3755) on Monday December 12 2016, @06:26PM (#440491) Journal

      Deuteronomy

      See?

      • (Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Monday December 12 2016, @09:40PM

        by nitehawk214 (1304) on Monday December 12 2016, @09:40PM (#440564)

        Perhaps he is afraid of the EU.

        --
        "Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 13 2016, @10:56PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 13 2016, @10:56PM (#441055)

        Can Anonymous Coward write "Deuteronomy"?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 12 2016, @06:26PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 12 2016, @06:26PM (#440492)

      See also: Deuteronomy