Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday December 12 2016, @02:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the perception-differential dept.

The Atlantic has an article about people with a type of synesthesia which causes them to see time around them.

The English polymath Francis Galton first described calendar forms in 1880, and the phenomenon has been rarely studied since. But Vilayanur Ramachandran, a neuroscientist at the University of California, San Diego who has been studying synesthesia for a long time, has been slowly amassing and studying people with this odd perceptual quirk.

He met one such person, a 25-year-old woman named Emma, a year ago. Her calendar is a hula hoop, which stretches horizontally in front of her and touches her chest at one point—always December 31st, no matter the actual time of year. Emma uses her calendar to organize her life, attaching events to the various months and zooming around the hoop to access them.

The hoop is anchored to her body; it doesn't move if she tilts or rotates her head. "Obviously, this is a construct in her head, not a real hula hoop stuck to her chest," says Ramachandran. But if she turns her head to the right, the left side of the calendar became fuzzier, as it would be if it was an actual physical object. More bizarrely, the memories that she had appended to those months also became indistinct and harder to recall.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by FatPhil on Monday December 12 2016, @05:22PM

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Monday December 12 2016, @05:22PM (#440452) Homepage
    I'm also not calling it bullshit, but I notice that a third of the references in the paper were authored by the same author. That's normally a warning sign that he's a bit marginal. Of course, he might be the pre-eminant and leading expert in the field, in which case it might not be the case at all that he's an outsider, to judge that you'd need to have counts of references *into* his work.

    I will admit I've still not read Oliver Sachs's /The Man who Mistook his Wife for a Hat/, so I can't claim to be even particularly knowledgeable in the field of fucked up brains, but I do have some experience of synaesthesia - years back I got some really trippy hash cookies, and noticed that the balls on the snooker table I was watching were making notes as they rolled around the screen. Being a scientist, I investigated further and discovered that I could play controllable tunes with my vision by passing my outspread fingers between my eyes and the telly. My g/f thought I was a bit of a doofus when she discovered me doing this, but she knew synesthesia is a thing, so it didn't take long to explain what I was doing and why - I may have been trippin' snooker-balls, but I was perfectly lucid.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Wednesday December 14 2016, @10:42AM

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Wednesday December 14 2016, @10:42AM (#441226) Homepage
    Hmm, just doing some background reading into The Man Who ..., and I've got to admit, Sacks comes over as a Bullshit Artist. The prime-playing savants fairy-story is exagerated to such a falsifiable extent. Book of prime numbers? Which he magically lost when asked to even identify? Bullshit Artist. He's an unreliable source, I don't think I can trust anything in the book if he's prepared to lie so eggregiously. Bullshit Artist.

    (The repeated title-capitalised phrase comes from /The Greasy Strangler/, a film all fans of John Waters or Troma should see, even if deep down it's a terrible movie.)
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves