SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
This story might be helpful to those tearing their hair out about the news lately:
I grew up believing that following the news makes you a better citizen. Eight years after having quit, that idea now seems ridiculous—that consuming a particularly unimaginative information product on a daily basis somehow makes you thoughtful and informed in a way that benefits society.
But I still encounter people who balk at the possibility of a smart, engaged adult quitting the daily news.
...
A few things you might notice, if you take a break:1) You feel better
A common symptom of quitting the news is an improvement in mood. News junkies will say it's because you've stuck your head in the sand.
But that assumes the news is the equivalent of having your head out in the fresh, clear air. They don't realize that what you can glean about the world from the news isn't even close to a representative sample of what is happening in the world.
...
2) You were never actually accomplishing anything by watching the newsIf you ask someone what they accomplish by watching the news, you'll hear vague notions like, "It's our civic duty to stay informed!" or "I need to know what's going on in the world," or "We can't just ignore these issues," none of which answer the question.
...
A month after you've quit the news, it's hard to name anything useful that's been lost. It becomes clear that those years of news-watching amounted to virtually nothing in terms of improvement to your quality of life, lasting knowledge, or your ability to help others. And that's to say nothing of the opportunity cost. Imagine if you spent that time learning a language, or reading books and essays about some of the issues they mention on the news.
Read on for the rest of the list.
(Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Wednesday December 14 2016, @11:16PM
Not belonging to any oppressed minorities, I have to imagine what that's like. Fair enough.
Because you seem to not have the time to do the research yourself
Because doing research on such a hotly contested topic is so easy to find the conclusion you want me to, sure. For example,
Safe space is a term for an area or forum where either a marginalised group are not supposed to face standard mainstream stereotypes and marginalisation
the first definition is mostly bullshit
Er...I'm afraid I don't quite see what angers you about this definition. It doesn't go far enough in saying a safe space is a good thing? This must be one of those things in my "pragmatic blind spot" where people say "OF COURSE THERE'S A BIG DIFFERENCE!" when I get confused.
If you can't see that that would be stressful, and that it would interfere with civil and academic discourse
In academia, sure, you want to get stuff done. As long as halfway-reasonable cutoff points are being used, people are there to learn, not fight. I mean, we're having this conversation on a random public forum tech nerd website that lets ACs post, so not exactly the same thing...
Having a safe place you can go to unwind is good. Trying to make everywhere "safe" can get a bit sticky.
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"