SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the we-can't-tell-you-what-we-can't-tell-you dept.
Google has published some of the National Security Letters (NSLs) it has received from the FBI:
Google is providing for the first time a look into the world of national security letters -- demands from the Federal Bureau of Investigation to hand over details about account holders and keep quiet about it.
The letters are a part of business for Google and other major internet companies, but traditionally they have been barred from acknowledging the letters' existence. That changed in 2013 when, in light of revelations about Internet surveillance by U.S. intelligence agencies, Google and others started fighting to disclose more about the demands.
That led to the creation of Google's "transparency report," which revealed the company receives thousands of requests for user data each month from law enforcement agencies around the globe. The national security letters remained secret, but on Tuesday, Google published a handful that are no longer covered by nondisclosure rules.
Google has redacted the email addresses of the users targeted as well as the names of the FBI employees who made the requests, so don't expect anything exciting in the letters.
(Score: 2) by jelizondo on Thursday December 15 2016, @01:17PM
First, please accept my apology for the last sentence in my previous post. I do get carried away when people fail to understand that they are being manipulated into accepting things that are contrary to their interests.
The whole “the Russians did it” charade illustrates the point. Who says the Russians, now even Putin personally, intervened in the recent elections? A “high-ranking officer”? What’s the evidence? Oh, it’s secret. Trust us. In other words, “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.” [youtube.com]
I watched recently the town hall meeting that Bernie Sanders held at Kenosha, WI and saw a woman adamantly arguing against free college education. What? Yes, she said more or less, that everyone had the opportunity to go to college but it should not be considered a right. Why? Because she won’t be paying for someone else’s kids to go to college! So we should not build public roads, they might be used by some free-rider bum who hasn’t paid his fair share of taxes, like Warren Buffett [cnn.com] or Donald Trump [nytimes.com].
Would it not be sensible to close the loopholes that allow rich people and companies to pay little to no taxes? Hell no! They are the job creators, except that the jobs created are in China, India, Mexico and other places. What does the voting taxpayer does? He votes for the guy offering such tax-dodging people a break! [fortune.com] (For the record, I hate HRC and Trump; both are part of the oligarchy.)
Go to court you say? I donate to the EFF and they have gone to court in our collective behalf, with disappointing results [eff.org]. and so has the ACLU, with meager results [aclu.org].
The solution is for more people to realize we are being manipulated into voting into office people who serve corporate interests and start electing independents and progressives, one House seat at the time to reform a system that is dangerously tilted toward the rich.