Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday December 15 2016, @02:21AM   Printer-friendly
from the reining-in-the-advertisers dept.

Unlike the US, the EU has some fairly strict privacy laws. Anyone wishing to operate commercially in Europe has to comply with these regulations, but that is not resting easy with the (mainly) US organisations who feel that this will adversely affect their ability to use user's private data in order to target them with relevant advertisements. The EU wants to make it necessary, amongst other changes, for users to opt in to browser data tracking rather than the present opt-out.

Google, Facebook and other online advertising businesses face strict new privacy rules from Brussels on the ways they can track people online.

The new rules would compel websites and browsers, such as Google Chrome, to switch from a default of allowing users to opt out of online advertising to asking them to opt in to view adverts based on their browsing history, according to a leaked draft of new proposals from the European Commission.

The EU's executive arm will also tighten its regulatory grip over services such as WhatsApp and Skype as part of a sweeping overhaul of the bloc's "ePrivacy" directive, which dictates everything from online tracking to marketing emails.

Not unsurprisingly, the online advertisers are claiming that such a move will signal the end of the internet:

"This is very concerning — it's putting at risk the entire internet as we know it," said Yves Schwarzbart, head of policy and regulatory affairs at the Internet Advertising Bureau in the UK. "Our number one concern is asking for prior permission. Advertising is the funding model of the internet, and helps publishers create better content. That whole model could be undermined."

Instead, web advertising groups will be forced to rely on internet browsers encouraging as many people as possible to opt in. "It is a big deal to opt in for the first time, but once you have done it — then you are good to go," said Eduardo Ustaran, a partner specialising in data protection at Hogan Lovells.

Furthermore:

[...] In a boon to the telecoms industry, operators will be able to use customer metadata, including when and to whom a call was made, in order to provide "value added services" such as advertising.

As part of the overhaul, rules around cookie warnings — the unpopular pop-up boxes that show when a website is tracking a user — will also be relaxed. Websites that use cookies to monitor things such as the number of visitors will not be required to warn users.


[Editor's Note: Substantially rewritten to meet SN submission guidelines]

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday December 15 2016, @06:50PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday December 15 2016, @06:50PM (#441718)

    > followed us around like a creepy-ex who thinks restraining orders only apply to other people.

    it's gonna be okay, folks. We're going to teach those terrible west-coast companies. They're bad. I mean, real bad.
    We're gonna teach them data abstinence. At least until they've committed to each customer. Real commitment, folks. Not like those Eastern Europeans that you have to change regularly. I'm telling you, we will tell them that "no is no", but none of this "only yes is yes" stuff, folks. They're terrible. Really bad people. But the point is that we'll teach them not to grab other people's privates data, folks. Unless they're rich, I guess, because then customers can't really say no. We have the best people. I'm telling you the data abstinence will work. That's a great deal.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 16 2016, @12:20AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 16 2016, @12:20AM (#441866)

    We're gonna teach them data abstinence.

    When they don't abstain and an 'accident' happens, can I abort them (the companies, not the accidents)? Oh for the love of all that is good, say "yes"...