Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday December 15 2016, @03:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the hello,-ma,-ma-and-pa dept.

The UK's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority will decide on December 15th whether to let three-person embryo trials proceed:

Authorities in the United Kingdom may soon approve clinical testing of the so-called "three-parent embryo" technique to prevent the transmission of potentially fatal genetic disease, despite ongoing concerns about its effectiveness. An advisory panel of the U.K. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), announced today that the procedure is ready for limited clinical testing, Nature reports, and HFEA is expected to make an official decision on whether to allow such trials on 15 December.

The first baby born using the technique occurred in September.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @04:55AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @04:55AM (#441516)

    If an X chromosome and a Y chromosome are placed into another woman's egg then the process always has two genetic mothers. On this basis, does the father of a three parent child pay more alimony or less alimony?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @05:02AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @05:02AM (#441518)

    If an X chromosome and a Y chromosome are placed into another woman's egg then the process always has two genetic mothers.

    No, I think you misunderstand what "genetic" means. One genetic, another mitochondrial, and possibly a third gestational. But I am just here to preemptively remind Runaway1946 that he is an ass.

    • (Score: 2) by fishybell on Thursday December 15 2016, @05:04AM

      by fishybell (3156) on Thursday December 15 2016, @05:04AM (#441519)

      Two genetic, one mitochondrial, possibly a fourth gestational.

  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Thursday December 15 2016, @06:34PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Thursday December 15 2016, @06:34PM (#441716) Journal

    I doubt a judge will factor in the mitochondrial mother at all, but we may be in for crazier scenarios, such as pick-and-choose genetics from 3 mothers, 1 mitochondrial, and a surrogate to give birth. That's 5 "mothers". And I think I know who to market that procedure to..........

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]