Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday December 15 2016, @09:05PM   Printer-friendly
from the driverless-cars-are-more-useful-than-carless-drivers dept.

According to c|net, Uber is preparing to launch self-driving cars in San Francisco, as it has done in Pittsburgh:

Uber's self-driving cars, accompanied by a human driver, have been traveling on the streets of San Francisco for the last three to four months. The company has said the cars are being used solely to collect data for maps. Mapping streets is part of readying autonomous vehicles for the open road, so they can identify routes and learn to detect obstacles.

Uber isn't saying when it's going to roll out its self-driving cars to passengers in San Francisco. The company declined to comment for this story. But CNET has learned that Uber will officially launch the program on Wednesday; we also learned that Uber worked in partnership with Volvo to develop the self-driving cars.

As of September, Uber didn't have a permit to run autonomous cars in California. It's unclear if the Department of Motor Vehicles has since given the company a permit. The DMV didn't return requests for comment.

So far, Uber's self-driving cars are available in only one US city -- Pittsburgh. After 18 months of testing, the company launched a small fleet of autonomous vehicles in September in the city. Now when riders hail an Uber there, they have a chance of being picked up in a self-driving car that's accompanied by a "safety driver." Uber said it plans to have 100 self-driving cars in Pittsburgh by the end of the year.

Also at The Verge .


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by ikanreed on Thursday December 15 2016, @09:41PM

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Thursday December 15 2016, @09:41PM (#441796) Journal

    Ah yes, nothing like casual murder to help reduce the resentment towards sudden gentrification that rendered you homeless.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @11:23PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 15 2016, @11:23PM (#441836)

    So why are you an evil racist if you oppose poor people moving from the inner cities into the suburbs and thereby pulling your property value down (which was happening in the 60s and 70s), but you are a defender of social justice if you oppose middle class people from moving into your neighborhood which would pull your property value up? Aren't the middle class yuppies integrating the inner cities just like the blacks were integrating the suburbs?

    • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Thursday December 15 2016, @11:32PM

      by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Thursday December 15 2016, @11:32PM (#441842) Journal

      This is why you constantly think "SJWs" are unfairly calling you racist. Because you make it up.

      Did Bay Area housing prices more than double in a decade? Yes.
      Will that make anyone who considered that their home angry? Yes(unless they're an owner).
      Are the targets of their blame really, truly, ethically culpable? Probably not, but murdering people is exactly the response I'd expect from someone who was.

      • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 16 2016, @12:29AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 16 2016, @12:29AM (#441871)

        Did suburban housing prices drop around cities like Detroit, Washington DC, etc. when inner city people moved outwards? Yes.
        Will that make anyone who considered that their home angry? Yes.
        Are the targets of their blame really, truly, ethically culpable? Probably not.

        In your example, your conclusion is you give them a pass and, hey, even shake their hands for being heroes. In my example, you blame them for being awful racists and a blight on society.

        Again, it is the SJW diode - it only works one-way. Heads I win, tails you lose. That's why so many people don't have respect for those kind of people, because they are fundamentally hypocrites, and blind to it to a remarkable level.